Back
NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Mooli – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Narendra Singh Dhaddha, J.
1. This Civil Misc. Appeal has been filed by the appellant-Insurance Company (for short 'the Insurance Company') under section 30 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (for short, the Act of 1923) against the judgment dated 30.11.2012 passed by learned Workmen Compensation Commissioner, Sikar in claim case No. WCC(F)47/2010 titled as Smt. Mooli & Anr. v. Lalit Kumar & Ors., whereby the respondent No. 3-Owner and appellant (respondent Nos. 1 and 2 therein) have been directed to pay Rs. 4, 48, 000/- as compensation alongwith interest @ 9% per annum thereon from 24.06.2010, till deposition of the amount with the Commissioner. They have also been directed to deposit Rs. 2500/- with the Commissioner towards funeral expenses for payment thereof to the respondent Nos. 1 and 2-claimants, within 30 days from the date of order, failing which the interest would be payable @ 12% per annum in place of 9% per annum.
2. Learned counsel for the Insurance Company submits that learned Commissioner wrongly allowed the claim petition filed by the claimants. Learned counsel for the Insurance Company also submits that there was no relationship of employee and employer be
The High Court's jurisdiction under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act is limited to substantial questions of law, and it cannot re-evaluate factual findings.
The High Court's jurisdiction under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act is limited to substantial questions of law; it cannot re-evaluate evidence or disturb findings unless they are pervers....
The High Court's jurisdiction under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act is limited to substantial questions of law, preventing re-appreciation of evidence or disturbance of factual findings.
The High Court's jurisdiction under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act is limited to substantial questions of law, and it cannot re-appreciate evidence or disturb factual findings.
The appellate jurisdiction of the High Court is confined only to examine the substantial questions of law arising in the case, as provided under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
The main legal point established is the limited jurisdiction of the High Court to examine substantial questions of law under the Workmen's Compensation Act, emphasizing the finality of the Commission....
The limited jurisdiction of the High Court to examine substantial questions of law only and not to reappreciate evidence or findings of fact.
Limited jurisdiction of the High Court in appeals under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
Limited jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act to examine substantial questions of law only.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
