SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1561

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI
NINALA JAYASURYA, J.
Davuluri Adaiah – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Writ Petition No.1870 of 2023
Decided on : 27-01-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.Siva Sankara Rao Borra
For the Respondents: G.P. for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development, G.P. for Home, G.P. for Revenue, Mr.G.Venkata Reddy

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 14, Article 21 - The petitioner challenges an impugned notice to remove encroachments on the road without affording an opportunity for a show cause. The petitioner claims that relevant material exists to disprove the allegations of illegal encroachment. (Para 3, 5)

(B) Natural Justice - The court upholds the principle of natural justice, emphasizing the necessity of providing an opportunity to the petitioner before taking coercive action against him.

Facts of the case:
The writ petition challenges a notice directing removal of alleged encroachments made by the petitioner on a road, claiming that no opportunity was given to respond to the allegations.

Findings of Court:
The court rules that the notice shall be treated as a show cause notice, allowing the petitioner two weeks to respond and requiring the authority to act within three weeks thereafter.

Issues: The primary issue was the lack of opportunity given to the petitioner before the issuance of the notice.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that natural justice mandates notice and opportunity for the petitioner before coercive action is taken against him.

Result: Writ Petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. challenge against notice for alleged encroachment. (Para 1 , 2)
2. right to be heard before enforcement action. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's obligation to ensure fair procedure. (Para 5)
4. outcome of the writ petition and directions. (Para 6)

ORDER :

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayatraj representing respondents 1 to 3. Also heard learned Standing Counsel for the 5th respondent.

2. The Writ Petition is filed challenging the order in the form of Notice dated 18.01.2023 issued by the 5th respondent, wherein the petitioner was directed to remove the constructions stated to have been made by encroaching the road, within three days from the date of receipt of notice.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the impugned proceeding is titled as ‘notice’, it is in the form of an order and before issuing the said direction in the notice impugned, no opportunity was afforded to the petitioner calling upon him to show cause as to why action shall not be taken in the matter. He submits that had an opportunity been afforded to the petitioner, he would have filed relevant material to substantiate his case and satisfy the authorities that there is no illegal encroachment, as alleged in the impugned notice. He submits that there is imminent threat in the matter, hence the petitioner is constrained to approach this Court seeking appropriate directions.

4. The learned Standing Counsel for the 5th respondent, on the other hand, submits that action is sought to be initiated in view of the constructions made by the petitioner by occupying the road. He further seeks time to secure instructions as to whether any show cause notice was issued prior to issuing the notice, which is under challenge in the Writ Petition.

5. This Court has considered the matter and perused the material on record. As seen from the impugned notice, it would appear that prior to issuance of the same, no opportunity was afforded to the petitioner, much less by issuing a show cause notice and in fact there is no reference to issuance of any such show cause notice. Under those circumstances, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition with the following directions:

    1) The notice dated 18.01.2023 impugned in the Writ Petition shall be treated as ‘show cause notice’;

    2) The petitioner is granted two (2) weeks time for filing objections/reply to the said notice;

    3) On receipt of the explanation/reply, the 5th respondent shall pass appropriate orders, in accordance with Law, after giving due opportunity to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three (3) weeks from the date of receipt of the explanation/reply from the petitioner.

    4) Till passing appropriate orders as directed above, no coercive action in respect of the subject matter property shall be resorted to.

6. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications in the above writ petition, if any, shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top