Back
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Y. Nagasubbamma W/o Late Palireddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of 1st respondent in including the land in an extent of Ac. 2.48 cents in S. No. 1540 of Chintakommadinne Village and Mandal, Kadapa District, in prohibited property list of G.O.Ms. No. 152 dated 27.03.2023 under Section 22-A(1)(a) as assigned land and consequential action of 5th respondent in refusing to register the document vide P. No. 305 of 2023 dated 17.10.2023, as illegal and arbitrary.
2..........
(b) During the year 2012, petitioner intended to sell the subject land and approached the 5th respondent to furnish market value particulars. The 5th Respondent refused to furnish the information stating that as per the list communicated by t
The doctrine of res judicata applies to writ petitions, preventing re-litigation of issues already decided, thereby ensuring finality in judicial decisions.
The court ruled that land cannot be classified as prohibited under Section 22-A without proper Gazette notification, allowing registration of sale deeds.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the refusal for registration of properties based on defective notifications under Section 22-A of the Registration Act was illegal, arbitrary,....
The court established that proper notifications and adherence to guidelines are essential for enforcing prohibitions on property registration under Section 22(A) of the Registration Act.
Assigned land sold in auction by Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society is ceased to be assigned land on its sale.
Registering authorities must register documents presented if procedural requirements are satisfied, regardless of ownership disputes, ensuring compliance with the Registration Act and securing justic....
Issue of direction by respondent No.2 to include the property under Section 22 A (1) (e) of the Registration Act without vesting the land on the Government divesting from alienee on resumption follow....
The court ruled that the inclusion of petitioners' land in the prohibition register was erroneous and directed rectification based on prior judicial decisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
