V. SRINIVAS
Vavilapalli Rajeswari – Appellant
Versus
Bavera Appalanaidu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal filed under section 96 of the cpc regarding decree in partition case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. partition suit for ancestral property. (Para 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 11) |
| 3. plaintiff asserting claim for partition of ancestral properties. (Para 5) |
| 4. arguments on entitlement to share. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 5. rights of daughters under hindu succession act. (Para 35 , 36 , 38 , 39) |
| 6. sharing of joint family properties post-defendant's death. (Para 42 , 44 , 45) |
| 7. court partly allowed the appeal and delineated shares. (Para 49) |
| 8. final orders regarding property division. (Para 50 , 51 , 52) |
JUDGMENT :
V. Srinivas, J.
This appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against the decree and judgment dated 26.09.2001 in O.S.No.10 of 2000 on the file of the Court of learned Senior Civil Judge, Rajam.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter are referred to as they are arrayed before the trial Court.
3. The appellant herein is the plaintiff and the respondents herein are the defendants before the trial Court.
4. The plaintiff instituted the suit for partition and separate possession of her 1/3rd share in suit schedule properties and in the amount deposi
Bhagwan Swaroop and Others v. Mool Chand and Others
Danamma @ Suman Surpur v. Amar
Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma
Chandramohan Ramchandra Patil v. Bapu Koyappa Patil (Dead) through LRs
Daughters have equal rights as coparceners in ancestral property under the Hindu Succession Act as amended in 2005, affecting share distribution in partition cases.
Daughters have equal rights and shares in ancestral joint family properties under Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, as amended by the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005.
The court affirmed that ancestral property remains so despite partition, and daughters are entitled to equal shares under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, as amended.
Daughters have equal rights as sons in ancestral property under the Hindu Succession Act, 2005, regardless of prior claims of partition.
The court reaffirmed that daughters have equal rights as sons in ancestral properties, emphasizing the applicability of Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act.
Daughters have equal coparcener rights in ancestral property under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005.
The court affirmed that partition shares from ancestral property remain joint family property for descendants, entitling them to assert claims over the inherited property.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.