Back
K. SURESH REDDY, B. V. L. N. CHAKRAVARTHI
Gokeda Pydithalli (A -1) – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(B.V.L.N. Chakravarthi, J.)
1. The appeal assails the judgment dated 31.03.2009 passed by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Vizianagaram at Parvathipuram, in Sessions Case No.71 of 2005. During the pendency of the appeal, A-2 died on 07.05.2021 and as such, appeal filed for the A-2 has abated vide this Court’s order dated 06.10.2023.
2. The accused No.1 and 2 were tried for the offence U/s.302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as (‘I.P.C.’) for causing the death of one Smt.Senapathi Demudamma (hereinafter referred to as deceased) on 12.10.2004 at about 09.00 p.m. in Veeluparthi Village, near the house of Senapathi Tata (P.W-1). The accused A-3 along with A-4 were tried for the offence U/s.302 r/w.34 of I.P.C. for causing death of Smt.S.Demudamma. A-1 was also tried for the offence U/s.324 I.P.C. for voluntarily causing simple hurt to Gokeda Somulamma (P.W-4) on or about the same day, time and place mentioned above. A-2 and A-3 along with A-4 were tried for the offence U/s.324 r/w.34 of I.P.C. for voluntarily causing simple hurt to Smt.G.Somulamma (P.W-4) on or about the same day, time and place mentioned above. A-
The court ruled that the prosecution's failure to explain the injuries on the accused and reliance on interested witnesses without independent corroboration rendered the conviction unsafe.
The judgment underscores the principle that an acquittal should not be overturned without compelling evidence, emphasizing the importance of consistent and reliable witness testimonies in criminal ca....
Prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; significant contradictions in witness testimony can invalidate a case leading to acquittal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the careful consideration of evidence and the application of the benefit of doubt in determining the guilt of the accused.
Prosecution must substantiate charges with reliable evidence; significant discrepancies in witness statements and medical evidence warrant acquittal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
