SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1190

VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
E. Sandhya – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Surepalli Madhava Rao
For the Respondents: Mallampalli Srinivas, Central Govt. Counsel and P. Bhaskar

ORDER :

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa, J.

1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking Certiorari, for the following relief:

    ".... Calling for the records and quash the impugned proceedings issued vide proceedings No.B/P.Com/ 563/ III/98/2009 dt.14.11.2018 by the 3rd respondent herein as highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, malafide and consequently, to quash the same and direct the respondents to forthwith provide compassionate appointment to the 2nd petitioner herein in any suitable post as per the 2nd petitioner's qualifications and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."

2. The facts of the case, in brief, are as follows:

a. The petitioners 1 and 2 are the mother and son respectively. One E.Lakshminarayana[hereinafter referred to as 'the deceased'] (who is the husband of the petitioner No. 1 while alive, worked as Mechanical (CMW) Fitter, in respondent-Railways from 10.10.1972 to 08.01.2006. He died while on duty on 08.01.2006.

b. During the life time of the said E.Lakshminarayana, with the consent of his first wife, namely, E.Komala (since she was issueless), he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top