SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1277

K. SREENIVASA REDDY
Narra Lokanadha Rao S/o Madhava Rao – Appellant
Versus
Rambukta Satyanarayana S/o Pothanna – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Respondent: S.V.S.S. Siva Ram

ORDER :

1. The Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, has been filed aggrieved by the Order dated 21.04.2022 passed in C.M.A. No. 8 of 2018 on the file of the VII Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam.

2. The respondent/plaintiff filed Original Suit No. 1193 of 2017 on the file of the VI Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam seeking permanent injunction restraining the petitioner/defendant and his men from interfering with possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property by respondent/plaintiff. The respondent/plaintiff filed I.A. No. 970 of 2017 in the said suit seeking temporary injunction pending disposal of the suit.

3. The brief facts are that the respondent/plaintiff filed the aforesaid suit stating that plaint schedule property is his absolute property, devolved from his ancestors. For the last 20 years, the plaintiff and his family are residing in the said property constructing two ACC sheets roofed houses on a basement. D. Nos. 11-3-62/2 and 11-3-62/3 and Assessment Nos. 1089008597 and 1089002285 were given by the Municipality. Respondent/plaintiff has been paying taxes to the municipality. Electrical service connection SC No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top