SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1253

K. SURESH REDDY
Augutu Pedda Naganna – Appellant
Versus
B. Naga Ratnamma alias Ratnamma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Challa Sivasankar.
For the Respondent: Mr. Vivekananda Virupaksha.

ORDER :

(K. Suresh Reddy, J.)

Questioning the order dated 30.11.2023 passed by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kurnool in I.A.No.446 of 2023 in OS No.256 of 2018 allowing the L.R. application filed under Order XXII Rule 3 of CPC, present civil revision petition is filed by the Legal representatives of the 5th defendant.

2. Heard Sri Challa Siva Sankar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Vivekananda Virupaksha, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3.

3. Brief facts of the case are that, the plaintiff, who is the mother of Respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein, filed a suit against the father of the petitioners herein and five others, for declaration of title and for consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining defendant Nos.1 to 4 from deleting the entries in ROR, pattedar pass books and title deeds with regard to the plaint schedule property. During the pendency of the suit, the sole plaintiff died on 07.05.2023. Thereafter, respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein filed I.A.No.446 of 2023 under Order XXII Rule 3 CPC seeking to implead them as legal representatives of the deceased sole plaintiff. After hearing both sides, the said petition was allowed and respondent Nos.2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top