SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1326

R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, HARINATH NUNEPALLY
State of Andhra Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
CV Ramani – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :The Advocate General
For the Respondents: G.V.S. Mehar Kumar

JUDGMENT :

R. Raghunandan Rao, J.

1. Heard the Learned Advocate General appearing for the appellants, and Sri G.V.S. Mehar Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. The respondent herein sought issuance of a ryotwari patta under Section 11 of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 (herein referred to as "Estates Abolition Act"), in relation to Ac.8.52 cents of land in R.S.No.17 of Krishnarayapuram Village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. This claim was made on the ground that the predecessors of the respondent had been in possession and enjoyment of the land from 1914 and as such, she would be entitled for grant of ryotwari patta. It was also the contention of the respondent that the aforesaid land of Ac.8.52 cents was converted into a private tank, called Venkappa tank, and the same had been constructed by her ancestors. The respondent also pointed out that the tank was wrongly noted as government poramboke tank during the re-survey operation and an application for change of classification of the land from government poramboke to zeroythi was filed. In consideration of this application, a memo No.41025/EA & AR/A1/2009

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top