SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 604

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
State of Andhra Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
L. Ramesh – Respondent


Judgement Key Points

Question 1? Question 2? Question 3?

Key Points: - The rough patta grants rights enabling mutation of names and pattedar pass books; Board Standing Orders 15 and 16 do not apply to Estates Abolition Act claims. (!) (!) - Rough patta is considered to create rights, potentially offsetting challenges to title; jurisdiction and applicability of water body protection judgments to the subject land are limited. (!) (!) (!) - The Writ Appeal was dismissed; Government revisions and memos regarding rough pattas and ryotwari patta procedures have been upheld or not interfered with, and the earlier revisional order of 25/4/2016 remains in force. (!) (!) (!)

Question 1?

Question 2?

Question 3?


JUDGMENT

R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO,J. - This Writ Appeal is filed against the Judgment of the learned Single Judge dtd. 4/8/2021 in W.P.No.8883 of 2020.

2. Heard Sri B. Seshibhushan Rao, learned Special Government Pleader attached to the office of the Learned Additional Advocate General for the Appellants and Sri Ambati Sudhakar Rao, learned counsel for the respondents.

3. Erragunta and Karakambadi villages of Renigunta Mandal of Chittoor District were Inam Estates regulated by the provisions of the A.P. (Andhra Area) Estates Land Act, 1908 and the A.P. (Andhra Area) Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred as Estate Abolition Act).

4. The Vendor of the petitioners, numbering 16 persons, in W.P.No.8883 of 2020, had been granted a rough patta, by the settlement officer, in the proceedings instituted to grant a ryothwari patta, under the provisions of the Estate Abolition Act. The title of the petitioners over the lands held by them in Sy.Nos.167 and 168 of Erragunta village and Sy.Nos.170, 341 and 342 of Karakambadi village, is traced to this rough patta given to their predecessor in title. Writ Petitioners 1 to 3 (in W.P.No.8883 of 2020) had purchased th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top