IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO, T.C.D.SEKHAR, JJ.
E Rajagopal Reddy, S/o. Late L. Venkata Reddy - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Andhra Pradesh - Respondent
Writ Appeal Nos. 544 & 563 of 2025
Decided on : 22-08-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts regarding land claims and surveys. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. respondents' counterarguments regarding land claims. (Para 5) |
| 3. arguments by appellants regarding evidence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court’s analysis on the validity of land claims. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. final decision to dismiss the writ appeals. (Para 24) |
JUDGMENT :
As these two Writ Appeals arise out of a common order and since the parties and the issues raised in both these Writ Appeals are common, they are being disposed of, by way of this common Judgment.
2. Heard Sri P. Veera Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Sri M. Venkata Ramana Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants and Smt. S. Pranathi, learned Special Government Pleader appearing from the office of the learned Advocate General for the official respondents.
3. The facts, in the present cases, have been extensively set out in the order of the learned Single Judge and we do not propose to set out the facts, in extenso, in this order also. However, a few facts are required to be set out before considering the contentions raised by either side.
4. The facts according to the appellants are as follows:
a) The appellants claim to be either legal heirs or purchasers of persons, who were in occupation and enjoyment of various extents of land, in Sy.Nos.46-57, 173-182, 211, 192-207 of Daminedu Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Chittoor District. The total extent of these lands is Ac.175.00.
b) Daminedu Village is an Inam village, falling within the ambit of Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 (here-in-after referred to as “the Act”). This village was surveyed in the year 1961. As there were a few errors in the survey, a fresh survey was again conducted in the years 2006 and 2009.
c) The predecessors of the appellants are said to have filed claims before the Settlement Officer, under the Act and these have remained pending. Apart from this, the appellants 22, 23 & 26 in W.A.No.563 of 2025 are said to have filed claim applications before the Settlement Officer for grant of Ryotwari pattas. However, these applications were rejected by an order, dated 24.05.2008, bearing L.Dis.No.F6/557/08, on the ground that the applications, which had been filed after 24.04.1983, cannot be considered. The appellants are said to have filed various representations before the Chief Commissioner of Land Administration as well as the Hon’ble Chief Minister and the Hon’ble Ministers, for orders being passed on the pending applications, for grant of Ryotwari pattas and directions had been issued to the Revenue Authorities to undertake such an exercise.
d) The lands under the possession and cultivation of the appellants, was classified, by mistake, as “Assessed Waste Dry” lands, in the survey conducted in the year 1961. When this mistake was pointed out, a fresh survey was conducted in the year 2006 and repeated in the year 2009. The records of the survey, conducted in the year 2009, would show that the appellants herein were in possession and enjoyment of the lands. As no steps were being taken to process the applications, for grant of Ryotwari pattas, the appellants in W.A.No.563 of 2025, had approached the erstwhile High Court of Andhra Pradesh, by way of W.P.No.1499 of 2010, for a direction to the Revenue Authorities to act in accordance with the memo No.52300/JA-2/2008-1, dated 17.10.2008 and consequently, pass orders for issuance of Ryotwari pattas in favour of the appellants.
e) The Authorities, even while the applications of the appellants were pending, had transferred and handed over Ac.35.53 cents of land situated in some of the survey numbers, mentioned above, to the A.P. State Housing Corporation Limited and subsequently, to Tirupati Municipal Corporation, which is impermissible and to set aside memo No.APSHL/Land Allocation/2008, dated 15.06.2009, under which the land had been transferred.
5. The Revenue Authorities filed co
Rights to land under the Andhra Pradesh Estates Abolition Act require proof of continuous possession and corresponding applications for Ryotwari pattas pre-dating the act's enactment.
Claims for ryotwari pattas must comply with statutory requirements; mere representations do not constitute valid claims.
The court held that petitioners failed to establish their entitlement to Ryotwari Patta and did not challenge the grant to Inamdars within the statutory period, leading to dismissal of their petition....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove that the subject lands are ryoti lands and have vested with the Government under the Ryotwari Act, 1948, in order to obtai....
The court established that jurisdictional overreach by administrative authorities can invalidate their orders, necessitating adherence to procedural fairness.
The court affirmed the validity of a ryotwari patta and mandated a factual inquiry into land classification, emphasizing that registration cannot be denied while the patta is in force.
Petitioner failed to establish timely claims and lineage rights for land ownership, justifying dismissal of appeals.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.