IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
B.S. BHANUMATHI, J.
Pitti Naga Raju - Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. – Respondents
I.A. Nos. 2 and 3 of 2024 in Criminal Petition No. 613 of 2024
Decided On : 09-02-2024
ORDER :
(B.S. Bhanumathi, J.)
1. The Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, ('the CrPC) is filed to record the compromise and seeking to quash the proceedings in Spl.S.C.No.107 of 2018 on the file of the V Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge for trial of Offences under SC and STs (POA) Act, Nellore.
2. The facts in the present case are briefly as follows:
Thirumalasetti Adivaiah is working as tractor driver with the accused. On 08.08.2018, he accepted the request of another tractor driver to transport gravel dust. While so doing, to reach rice go-down situated opposite to Government College, at about 12 noon, the accused followed him, stopped his car, and asked LW1 to get into the car. When the accused got into the car, the accused abused him in filthy language in the name of his caste. The accused also slapped on the left cheek with his right hand and pressed with his hand on his chest on the ground that he joined as driver without intimating him. Basing on the statement of LW1, a case in Crime No.212 of 2018 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323 IPC and Section 3(l)(r)(s) of SCs/STs (POA) Act, was registered by Gudur II Town Police and after investigation, charge sheet has been filed against the accused.
3. Pending the criminal petition, I.A.Nos. 2 & 3 of 2024 are filed by the petitioner/accused under Sections 320(2) and 320 (6) CrPC, requesting to permit the parties to compound the offence and to record the compromise between the parties and consequently to quash the proceedings in Spl.S.C.No.107 of 2018 on the file of the V Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge for trial of Offences under SC and STs (POA) Act, Nellore.
4. When the matter was taken up, petitioner and the second respondent/de facto complainant are present. Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing R-1/State is present. H.C.(1897), Gudur II Town Police Station, Nellore District is present and identified the parties. That apart, they are identified with their original Adhar cards, photostat copies of which were already filed.
5. Both parties submitted that due to the intervention of the elders, the matter is amicably settled and that they voluntarily settled the issue. The second respondent/de facto complainant expressed that there is no objection to quash the case against the petitioner/accused.
6. The terms of compromise are reduced into writing in the form of a joint memorandum of compromise, which is signed by the parties and their counsels. The contents of the joint memo read as follows:
2. It is respectfully submitted that the petitioner/accused and 2nd respondent compromised at the intervention of the elders and well wishers of both the parties with an understanding that all of them shall live peacefully without an disputes or enmity between them. Accordingly, all of them are living peacefully and the 2nd respondent is not interested in prosecuting the case against petitioner herein."
7. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted to pass appropriate orders in view of the peculiar circumstances and facts in the present case. He placed reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Ra
Monica Kumar (Dr.) Vs. State of U.P.
Mrs. Dhanalakshmi Vs. R. Prasanna Kumar
Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Ram Kishan Rohtagi and others
State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Gourishetty Mahesh
Paramjeet Batra Vs. State of Uttarakhand
Madhavrao Jiwajirao Scindia Vs. Smbhajirao Chandrojirao Angre
Inder Mohan Goswami Vs. State of Uttaranchal
State of Punjab Vs. Gurdial Singh
The court can quash proceedings under Section 482 CrPC based on a voluntary compromise, balancing the objectives of the SC/ST Act with the nature of the offence.
The main legal point established is that the court can quash criminal proceedings on the basis of a genuine settlement between the parties, especially in cases where the offences are not of a serious....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent an abuse of the process of law and secure the ends of justice, especially in cases whe....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.