SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 1433

PURNENDU SINGH
Tulsi Kumar Saw – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s Rajeev Kumar Singh, Sr. Adv., Sanket.
For the State : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP.

Purnendu Singh, J.—Heard Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Sanket, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred the application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. for quashing the entire criminal proceeding initiated against the petitioner with regard to Kurtha P.S. Case No. 41 of 2009 registered for offences punishable under Section 498A/380 of the Indian Penal Code and all consequential orders including the judgment dated 29.04.2015 passed in G.R. No. 495/09/TR No. 679/15 arising out of the aforesaid F.I.R. whereby the petitioner has been convicted under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and other co-accused have been acquitted honorably.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the marriage of the informant was solemnized with the petitioner on 07.06.2006 according to Hindu rites, wherein her father allegedly spent about Rs. 5 lakhs and gifted several articles including a Baleno Delta car. It is alleged that the parents of the petitioner had met her prior to the marriage and that after about two months of marriage, the petitioner along with his parents began subj

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top