SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 80

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO, J
Polinati Sravan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Pulipati Radhika.

ORDER :

The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:

“…..to issue an appropriate order writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings vide D.No.475/2017 C.No.21/0EPR/2016, dt.12.06.2017 issued by the 4th respondent in imposing punishment of removal from service of the petitioner with immediate effect and further confirming the same by the 2nd and 3rd respondents is illegal and arbitrary and violation of procedure contemplated under Rule 20 of APCS (CC & A) Rules, 1991 and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 to reinstate the petitioner into service as Civil Police Constable (PC) with immediate effect with all service benefits….”

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed as Civil Police Constable (PC) in 2003. Subsequently, the petitioner was posted to the Anti-Narcotics Squad (ANS) in Kakinada after successfully completing police training at PTC, Vizianagaram. Later, the petitioner was transferred to the Uppalaguptam Police Station in East Godavari, within the Amalapuram sub-division, where the petitioner worked for about a year. In 2014, the pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top