Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Tunuguntla Bharathudu – Appellant
Versus
Tunukuntla Nagendra Laxaman Kumar – Respondent
Judgment:
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO, J.
The appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 14-3-2005 in O.S.No.44 of 1995 passed by the learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur, Guntur District. The suit is filed for preliminary decree for partition of plaint-A and B schedule properties into two equal shares and delivery of vacant possession of one such share to the plaintiff and for mesne profits from the date of suit till the date of delivery of vacant possession of the schedule properties and for costs.
2. The case of the plaintiff as narrated in the plaint, in brief, is as follows:
(a) It is pleaded that the plaintiff and the 1st defendant are children of late Tunuguntla Viswanadham and late Swarjya Laxmi. Plaint-A schedule property was purchased by his mother under a registered sale deed dated 06-11-1965 from one Dupaguntla Venkata Krishna Murthy and others. Whereas the plaintiff’s father purchased plaint-B schedule property from one Muppirisetty Sivarama Prasad and others in his name under a registered sale deed, dated 26-7-1962. Since then, they have been in possession and enjoyment of the plaint-A and B schedule properties as a single unit as absolute owne
A valid oral partition must be substantiated with evidence; unproven claims lead to invalidation of subsequent property transactions.
The sale deed executed by defendants in favor of the 4th defendant was invalid to the extent of the plaintiff's undivided share in the property.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the burden of proof lies on the party claiming a prior partition, and in the absence of documentary evidence, unchallenged evidence of the opp....
The burden of proof in establishing the existence and extent of an oral partition lies with the party claiming such partition.
In a partition suit, all legal heirs must be parties, and failing to prove a settlement deed invalidates claims to partition. The court upheld the necessity for complete participation of all heirs in....
The court emphasized that evidence cannot be adduced contrary to the arguments in a written document and held that the relief of partition cannot be granted in the face of a document registered lawfu....
The court ruled that an oral partition was established and the plaintiff cannot claim partial partition without including all relevant properties, adhering to heirs' rights under Hindu law.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to establish the remaining land after a sale of joint family property and the probative value of registered documents in determi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
