IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J
Katuri Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Late Venkateswarlu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh, Represented By Its Public Prosecutor, High Court Of A.P. – Respondent
ORDER :
(VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J.)
The instant petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , [for short ‘ Cr.P.C ’] has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2, seeking quashment of proceedings against them in C.C.No.833 of 2021 on the file of the Court of Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kavali for the offences under Sections 355 , 120B and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, [for short ‘ IPC ’]
2. The contents of the complaint filed Respondent No.2/Complainant, in brief, are as follows:
(i) Respondent No.2 and one Gummalapati Prasad are the practicing Advocates at Kavali. Gummalampati Prasad had reported to the Accused on 24-07-2021 that his grandmother Kamatham Mahalakshamma has a house bearing D.No. 6-8-37, Gayatri Nagar, Kavali and her son by name Kamatham Koteswara Rao, who has been working as ASI in CISF Bangalore Regiment, along with his family had temporarily come down to Kavali due to Corona outbreak at Bangalore, took shelter in the house of his mother Mahalakashamma from September 2020.
(ii) That being so, in view of the property disputes, the son of Mahalakshamma used to pressurize her to execute a document in his favour and beat h
The court upheld the continuation of proceedings against one accused due to specific allegations while quashing the case against another accused due to lack of allegations.
The court emphasized that inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. are to prevent abuse of process and secure justice, and quashing of FIR should be exercised sparingly.
The court established that civil disputes should not be mischaracterized as criminal offenses to avoid abuse of the judicial process.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to carefully evaluate the nature of offenses and the possibility of quashing proceedings under Sec. 482 of Cr.P.C., particularly in cases ....
The court emphasized that quashing proceedings requires compelling reasons, particularly when allegations are vague and unsupported by evidence.
The court quashed proceedings against the accused due to lack of prima facie evidence and emphasized the need for specific overt acts in cases under the SC/ST Act.
The court quashed proceedings against petitioners as allegations did not constitute offences under IPC or SC/ST Act, emphasizing the necessity of prima facie grounds for prosecution.
The court emphasized that inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be exercised sparingly to prevent abuse of process and ensure justice, allowing for investigation into allegations.
Inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. are to prevent abuse of process and secure justice, exercised sparingly, allowing investigations to proceed unless no cognizable offence is disclosed.
The court emphasized that inherent powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. should be exercised sparingly to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice, especially when allegations do not con....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.