Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Mohanthi Pydiraju – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's grievance is about interference in civil disputes. (Para 1) |
| 2. discussion on the procedural actions and status of the cases. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. clarification of the police's non-involvement in civil dispute resolutions. (Para 4) |
| 4. order directing police not to entertain civil dispute representations. (Para 5 , 6) |
The Grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition is that the respondent Nos.3 and 4, at the behest of the respondent No.5, are interfering in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the respondent No.5.
2. Heard Sri Bonu Rama Shankar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government pleader for Home, appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4.
3. The learned Assistant Government pleader for Home submitted the written instructions of the Station House officer, I Town police Station, Vizianagaram, and stated that the respondent No 5 had submitted a grievance application before the District Collector, Vizianagaram, on 05-05-2025 Therefore, the petitioner and the respondent No.5 were called to the respondent No.4-Police station and conducted an enquiry and opined that no further action was required to be taken on the
The police lack authority to mediate civil disputes, which must be addressed by civil courts or legal services authorities.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
