Back
CHALLA GUNARANJAN
T. C. Narayana Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur, Anantapur District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to cancellation of ryothwari patta. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's review of jurisdiction and statutory provisions. (Para 3 , 4 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. jurisdictional issue regarding appeal timeline. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. exceeding jurisdiction in appeal matters. (Para 7 , 12) |
| 5. implications of statutory limits on authority. (Para 8) |
| 6. writ petition allowed with no costs. (Para 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT :
1. This writ petition is filed questioning the orders passed by 1st respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer in Proceedings No.D.Dis.(D2)250/2005, dated 05.08.2005 cancelling the ryothwari patta granted to the petitioner in respect of land admeasuring Acs.9.50 cents in Survey No.1228 of Peddapolamada Village, Tadipatri Mandal, as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction.
2. The petitioner has been granted ryothwari patta on 28.11.1980 by 2nd respondent in exercise of powers under Section 7 (1) of Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for an extent of Acs.9.50 cents in Survey No.1228 of Peddapolamada Village, Tadipatri Mandal. The petitioner claims to be in possession and enjoyment of the subject lan
The Revenue Divisional Officer exceeded jurisdiction in cancelling a ryothwari patta beyond the statutory sixty-day appeal period established under Section 7(2) of the Act.
Suo motu revision powers cannot be exercised when an appeal remedy exists under the Tamil Nadu Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948.
Point of Law- Section 11 (a) of the Act it is clear that every ryot who claims for grant of ryotwari patta under Section 11 (a) of the Act has to fulfill the following requirements.(i) the land claim....
The Director of Survey and Settlement lacks jurisdiction to initiate suo moto proceedings under Section 5(2) for an appealable order, as per Section 12(2) of the Tamil Nadu Inam Estates Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove that the subject lands are ryoti lands and have vested with the Government under the Ryotwari Act, 1948, in order to obtai....
Proper assessment of the petitioner's right over the disputed survey numbers under the Tamil Nadu Minor Inam Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari Act, 1963 is crucial in granting Patta.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
