Back
K. MANMADHA RAO
Sitarama Swamy Temple – Appellant
Versus
Principle Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim of trustee appointment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counterarguments on hereditary claims. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. arguments of counsel regarding legality. (Para 8) |
| 4. legal requirements for trustee appointment. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. writ petition allowed, proceedings set aside. (Para 17) |
| 6. final ruling and closure of matters. (Para 18 , 19) |
JUDGMENT
1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief :
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 3rd respondent in appointing the 5th respondent as a Single Trustee of the petitioner temple vide Proceeding Rc.No.A1/8877/2013 dated 08.08.2013. The petitioner's Great Grandfather by name Sri Chelakani Dhramrayanam was constructed the petitioner Temple. Be
The appointment of a single trustee for a temple must comply with statutory procedures and requirements, including sufficient interest and time to manage the institution, as per the Act and its Rules....
The appointment of a single trustee who is an Executive Officer working under the Endowments Department is contrary to law.
The court upheld the validity of the Deputy Commissioner's appointment of an Executive Officer under the Act, emphasizing adherence to statutory authority despite allegations of violation of natural ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
