Back
K. MANMADHA RAO
Vedantham Rambabu – Appellant
Versus
Prl. Secy. Revenue Endowments Department, Hyderabad – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed under article 226. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner appointed as single trustee and issued notices. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. arguments contesting the appointment of an executive officer. (Para 4) |
| 4. court inquiries and responses regarding authority and duties. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. court finds no merit in writ petition. (Para 9) |
| 6. writ petition dismissed with no order as to costs. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT :
1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief :
This Court vide order dated 02.09.2015 while issuing notice before admission, has granted interim direction as under :
“…Any appointment of Executive Officer in pursuant to the order impugned shall abide the result of the writ
The court upheld the validity of the Deputy Commissioner's appointment of an Executive Officer under the Act, emphasizing adherence to statutory authority despite allegations of violation of natural ....
The court established that the Commissioner of Endowments lacked jurisdiction to revoke exemptions and appoint trustees without following due process as mandated by the Endowments Act.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the appointment of an Executive Officer to a religious institution must be supported by objective reasons and proper application of mind by....
The appointment of a single trustee who is an Executive Officer working under the Endowments Department is contrary to law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
