SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1545

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Mrs. Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa, J.
Kethe Naga Malleswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh and others – Respondent
Crl. P No.88 of 2022
Decided On : 14-10-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ch. B.R.P. Sekhar
For the Respondent: (Ms.) D. Prasanna Lakshmi (Assistant Public Prosecutor); Anup Koushik Karavadi (SC for A.P. TRANSCO)

The court upheld the Executive Magistrate's jurisdiction under Section 147 Cr.P.C. to maintain public order without adjudicating property title amid pending civil litigation.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 and Section 147 - Petition to quash the order passed by the Mandal Executive Magistrate regarding obstructing the approach road for a sub-station - The Magistrate acted within the law, considering public interest and did not adjudicate title disputes despite an ongoing civil suit - The impugned order did not require interference from the High Court. (Paras 6-14)

(B) Inherent powers of the High Court - The court's inherent powers should be utilized to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice but are not a substitute for appellate review - The balance of public interest versus private rights is a key consideration. (Paras 7-12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner contested an order directing that he refrain from obstructing an approach road to a sub-station, claiming ownership of adjacent land and asserting interference by the respondent. The Magistrate ruled to maintain public access pending civil litigation while referring to jurisdiction under Section 147 Cr.P.C.

Findings of Court:
The learned Magistrate did not decide on title but aimed to ensure public order and the continued operation of the sub-station's construction.

Issues: Whether the order under Section 147 Cr.P.C. was valid while a civil suit concerning the same subject property was pending.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the Executive Magistrate's order was appropriate as it did not infringe on the adjudication of property rights but aimed to maintain public order, with justifiable reasons based on longstanding use of the access road.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. filing of a petition under section 482 for quashing orders. (Para 1)
2. factual background of land dispute and complaint (Para 2)
3. arguments presented by both sides concerning jurisdiction and authority. (Para 3)
4. arguments about jurisdiction and legal authority (Para 4 , 5)
5. court's analysis on the impugned order and its alignment with statutory provisions. (Para 6 , 8 , 12)
6. court's analysis of evidence and legal standings (Para 7 , 9 , 10)
7. legal reasoning supporting the decision (Para 11 , 13)
8. final decision to dismiss the petition (Para 14 , 15)

JUDGMENT/ORDER :

The instant petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C'), has been filed by the petitioner seeking to quash the Order dated 16.12.2021 passed in MC No.217 of 2021 under Section 147 Cr.P.C., by the learned Mandal Executive Magistrate, Nuzvid.

2. The facts that led to filing of the present petition, in brief, are as follows :

(a) On 07.12.2021, respondent No.2 herein addressed a letter to the Tahsildar-cum-Mandal Executive Magistrate, Nuzvid Mandal, Nuzvid stating that the Deputy Executive Engineer, Construction Sub-Division-III, Gunadala, Vijayawada lodged a complaint with him on 01.12.2021 alleging that A.P. TRANSCO got approval for erection of 132/33 KV Sub-Station in a land of an extent of Acs.6.07 cents in RS Nos.469/2 and 492/2 situated at Digavalli Village alongwith connected lines for providing 9 hours agriculture power supply in day time to the farmers and A.P. TRANSCO acquired the said land by paying requisite compensation to the land owners and got it registered in its name with rights to use the common approach road of 15 feet from the existing R&B BT Road upto the sub-station. It was further in the said complaint that the petitioner herein, who is the owner of the adjacent land alongwith his son willfully blocked the approached road and obstructed the movements of the men and material into the sub-station site.

(b) Based on the said complaint, when respondent No.2 summoned and questioned the petitioner and his son, they stated that the approach road leads to their agricultural fields and the owner, who sold the said land to A.P. TRANSCO has no rights to pass on the said approach road.

(c) As there was possibility of arising Law & Order problem at Digavalli Village, respondent No.2 requested the Tahsildar, Nuzvid to take appropriate steps to prevent untoward incidents.

(d) On receipt of the said letter, The Mandal Executive Magistrate, Nuzvid issued a notice dated 07.12.2021 to respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein and petitioner and his sons to appear before him within seven days from the date of receipt of the said notice and to submit their objections and documents.

(e) Having received the said notice, petitioner herein and his sons filed a counter submitting that their properties are situated in RS Nos.492/3 and 469/3 and they have no landed properties in RS Nos.462/3 and 492/2 of Digavalli Village and they never interfered in the said lands; that respondent No.3 herein and his vendors have been interfering with their possession and enjoyment of their property and trying to lay a new road alongwith the eastern boundary of their land without any right. It is further submitted that as they are unable to resist the highhanded acts of respondent No.3 herein and his vendors, petitioner herein filed a suit in OS No.392 of 2021 on the file of the Court of I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Nuzvid against them for permanent injunction and also filed IA No.177 of 2021 therein and the same are pending enquiry.

(f) On considering the report submitted by the V.R.O., Digavalli and on perusing the satellite images of A.P. Satellite Application Center and Google Earth Images, having found that, the way has been existing for so many years to the lands which have been under possession and enjoyment of A.P. TRANSCO and the petitioner herein and his sons are trying to obstruct the same, the learned Mandal Executive Magistra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top