Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Section 4 Official Secrets Act Presumption and Prima Facie Evidence Bar Bail in Espionage Case: Punjab & Haryana HC
14 Mar 2026
Centre Revokes Wangchuk's NSA Detention Amid SC Challenge
14 Mar 2026
No Interference Allowed in Religious Prayers on Private Premises: Allahabad HC Cites Maranatha Precedent
14 Mar 2026
No Proof of Absolute Ownership by Mizo Chiefs Bars Fundamental Rights Claim Under Article 31: Supreme Court
14 Mar 2026
K. MANMADHA RAO
Phoenix Logistics Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT /ORDER :
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief :
The court affirmed that the state’s discretion in amending tender conditions is valid if it serves public interest, and a petitioner does not hold a vested right to lease renewal under changing condi....
The decision-making process in tender matters must be fair, transparent, and not arbitrary, and interference by the court is restricted unless there is evidence of mala fides, intention to favor some....
Public interest and fairness must govern the tendering process, prohibiting judicial intervention in absence of mala fides or arbitrariness.
Public authorities must act fairly and cannot arbitrarily terminate contracts without justification, reinforcing the legitimacy of expectations within public-private partnerships.
The court upheld the authority's discretion in setting eligibility criteria for tenders, emphasizing that judicial review is limited to cases of arbitrariness or unreasonableness.
Point of Law : Court would not sit in the arm chair of experts or the Tender Scrutiny Committee, which has scrutinized and found the 3rd respondent to be responsive and had to be awarded the contract....
ABL International Ltd. and another v. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Limited and others
-
Read summaryDr. Renuka Bulani Prasad v. National Board Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS)
-
Read summaryJagdish Mandal v. State of Orissa and others
-
Read summaryM/s. Agile Security Force Private Limited and others v. South Central Railway, rep., by its General Manager, Rail Nilayam
-
Read summaryM/s. Capital Enterprises v. The State of Arunachal Pradesh and others
-
Read summaryM/s. Hi-Tech Construction Company and others v. The Chief Secretary, Government of Nagaland and others
-
Read summaryM/s. N.G. Projects Limited v. M/s. Vinod Kumar Jain and others
-
Read summaryPSA Mumbai Investments PTE. Limited v. Board of Trustees of the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust and another
-
Read summaryRishi Kiran Logistics Pvt. Ltd. v. Board of Trustees of Kandla Port Trust and others
-
Read summaryState of Arunachal Pradesh v. Nezone Law House, Assam
-
Read summaryState of Tamil Nadu v. Hind Stone
-
Read summaryState of Uttar Pradesh v. Sudhir Kumar Singh and others
-
Read summarySuresh Kumar Wadhwa v. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
-
Read summaryTata Motors Limited v. The Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (Best) and others
-
Read summaryVidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation and others v. Anoj Kumar Agarwala and others
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.