SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1529

RAVI NATH TILHARI
G. Venkata Appala Raju – Appellant
Versus
G. Narimani – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : M. Sree Rama Rao
For the Respondent: (Ms.) A. Varalakshmi

JUDGMENT :-

Heard Sri M. Sree Rama Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.V.S.R. Subramanyam, learned Counsel representing Mrs. A. Varalakshmi, learned Counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 5.

2. The petitioner is the plaintiff in OS No.151 of 2018 on the file of Court of X Additional District Judge, Anakapalle. The respondent Nos.1 to 6 herein are the defendants in the said suit.

3. The suit was filed for partition of the plaint schedule property. The plaintiff claimed 1/5th share in the plaint schedule property. The case of the defendants inter alia was that the plaintiff had relinquished his claim by relinquishment deed dated 16.07.2015 in "B" Schedule property of that relinquishment deed. The plaintiff's case was that even after such relinquishment, when in the partition amongst the co-owners (excluding the plaintiff) the plaint schedule property in OS No.151 of 2018 fell to the share of the father of the plaintiff late Rama Rao, on his death of (Rama Rao) the plaintiff will have 1/5th share in the plaint schedule property. The defendants' further case was that the plaintiff did not have 1/5th share but 1/25th share in the plaint schedule property.

4. The 2nd defendant fi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top