IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, J.
Jammula Nandasai Mithra – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh and others – Respondent
WP No.5316 of 2025
Decided On : 04-04-2025
JUDGMENT /ORDER :
Heard Ms. Kota Krishna Deepthi, learned Counsel appearing for the writ petitioner; Smt. T.V. Sri Devi, learned Standing Counsel for Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences and Sri P. Soma Raju, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Medical & Health.
2. The present writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer :
3. On 04.03.2025, when this writ petition was listed for the first time, two weeks time was granted to the respondent authorities to file the counter-affidavit. In compliance of the same, the counter-affidavit has been filed by the Dr. N.T.R. University of Health Sciences (respondent No.2) on 12.03.2025.
4. Ms. Kota Krishna Deepthi, learned Counsel appearing for the writ petitioner has submitted the following facts:
4A. It is submitted that the writ petitioner has joined the MBBS Course in Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam for the academic batch 2020-2021. The writ petitioner is suffering from the disability of “Cerebral Palsy”. The “Certificate for Person with Disability” was issued to the writ petitioner (Ex.P12) to the effect that the writ petitioner suffers from physical (Locomotor/Orthopaedic) disability affecting the Bilateral Lower Limbs. It is submitted that this disability severely impacts the ability to complete written examinations within the stipulated duration under Section 2 (r) of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (for short ‘RPwD Act, 2016’).
4B. It is submitted that the disability of the writ petitioner, having been classified as a “Benchmark Disability”
Avni Prakash v. National Testing Agency (NTA) and others
Sunanda Bhandare Foundation v. Union of India
The court held that failing to provide reasonable accommodations to a disabled student during exams constitutes discrimination, affirming the right to equal educational opportunities.
The court established that all persons with disabilities are entitled to reasonable accommodations during examinations, ensuring no discrimination based on the nature of disability.
The court affirmed that visually impaired candidates are entitled to choose their scribes without restrictive qualifications, emphasizing compliance with statutory guidelines.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the right to assistance and extra time for persons with disabilities should not be limited to those with a 'benchmark disability', and the gov....
(1) For a person with disability, provision for facility of a scribe is in pursuance of statutory mandate to ensure that persons with disabilities are able to live a life of equality and dignity base....
Quantified disability alone cannot disqualify candidates from educational opportunities; individual assessments must determine eligibility based on the ability to pursue the course.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.