SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Cal) 1230

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Aniruddha Roy, J.
Ankur Manna - Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.A. No. 23056, 23203, 24186 of 2022
Decided On : 28-11-2022

Advocates appeared:
Kallol Basu, Advocate, Suman Banerjee, Advocate, S. Sarkar, Advocate, Swapan Kumar Datta, Advocate, Rajat Datta, Advocate, Sirsanya Bandyopadhyay, Advocate, Arka Kumar Nag, Advocate, Indranil Roy, Advocate, Sunit Kumar Roy, Advocate

Headnote:(A) Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - Section 32 - Reservation for persons with benchmark disabilities - The petitioners claimed inadequate reservations in the Post Graduate Medical Courses for persons with disabilities, particularly in Dermatology - Respondents confirmed a horizontal reservation of 5% based on the Act, asserting compliance with statutory mandates (Paras 32-50)

(B) Reasonable Accommodation - The court emphasized the necessity of creating an inclusive environment as mandated by law and interpreted the rights of persons with disabilities in accordance with this principle (Paras 62-75)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, suffering from physical disabilities, challenged the lack of reservations in various medical streams, particularly Dermatology, during the NEET-PG 2022 admission process citing violations of their rights under the Act.

Findings of Court:
The provisions for reservation were confirmed to adequately meet the statutory requirement of 5% across the state’s medical institutions, although some specific streams may lack seats due to numbers.

Issues: Primary issues included whether the seat matrix violated the reservation rights under the Act and the interpretation of reasonable accommodation in educational domains.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the law must be interpreted literally, ensuring compliance with the reservation mandate while understanding that the State maintains discretion over implementing seat allocations, provided they are not arbitrary (Paras 46-49, 54)

Result: All writ petitions dismissed, interim orders vacated.

Table of Content
1. reservation for persons with disabilities (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. statutory right for disability reservations (Para 8 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
3. reasonable accommodation under the law (Para 24 , 26 , 27 , 30 , 32)
4. judicial interpretation of the law (Para 36 , 39 , 44)
5. dismissal of the petitions (Para 61 , 62 , 63 , 66)

JUDGMENT

Aniruddha Roy, J. - This cluster of writ petitions are interrelated. The issues involved in these writ petitions pertain to reservation of seats for the persons with physical disabilities in respect of the National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test- Post Graduation, 2022 (for short, the said Entrance Test) being conducted on All India Basis by the National Board of Examinations for Post Graduate Medical Courses.

Facts:-

2. 50% seats of all Post Graduate Medical Courses under the said Entrance Test are filled up by way of counseling conducted by Medical Council Committee on All India basis which are called the All India Seats and the rest are filled up by way of counseling conducted by the State Authorities which are called State Quota Seats. The result of the said entrance examination was declared. The petitioner secured the rank as 71356. Since the petitioner did not serve in rural, remote and difficult areas, he was not eligible to the reservation provided for the In-Service Doctors. However, he was eligible to participate in the counseling in the open category.

3. The petitioner suffers from Deltoid Paralysis at his left arm. This is a left upper limb disability. This locomotor disability of the petitioner was assessed being 50% by the appropriate authority, Annexure P-2 to the writ petition. With the said disability the petitioner was eligible to avail of the reservation provided for the persons with disabilities. In the counseling process for admission for the Post Graduate Medical Courses for previous year the petitioner participated under the physically handicapped (PH) category.

4. On September 21, 2022 the respondent no.4 issued the notification for counseling, with the time schedule mentioned therein, Annexure P-3 to the writ petition. On September 27, 2022 the respondent authority issued the seat matrix for counseling process for the State Quota, Annexure P-4 to the writ petition.

5. From the said seat matrix the petitioner came to learn that the reservation was provided in the same for the persons with disabilities in an arbitrary manner, without there being any consideration for the nature of the stream in the post graduate courses. No reservation was provided for the persons with disabilities in the stream Dermatology, whereas same provisions were made for General Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics and other streams. In all these streams the similarly placed persons suffering from the identical locomotor disabilities got the opportunity to avail of the reservation but the petitioner opted stream for Dermatology where such reservation was not provided for.

6. Feeling aggrieved the petitioner made representations dated September 28, 2022 before the respondent authorities, Annexure P-5 to the writ petition. The petitioner contended that for not providing such reservation for the stream Dermatology was in violation of the provisions laid down under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act , 2016 (for short, the said Act). The relevant respondent authorities replied to the said representation of the petitioner and contended that the necessary reservation was done and provided as per the roster prepared by the respondent authorities. On request of the petitioner the petitioner was provided with a copy of West Bengal State Higher Education Institutions (Reservation in Admissions) Rules, 2013 (for short, the said 2013 Rules), Annexure P-5 to the writ petition and informed the petitioner on the basis of the same the reservation was provided for.

7. No reservation was provided f













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top