Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Preethi Sarafogi – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's eligibility and examination attempts. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. legal arguments surrounding examination attempts. (Para 4 , 8) |
| 3. court's observation on the petitioner's disability and additional time. (Para 5 , 6 , 11) |
| 4. regulatory framework and court’s assessment of rights. (Para 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. conclusion allowing the petition with conditions. (Para 12 , 13) |
ORDER :
The writ petition is filed with a prayer to call for the records on the file of the fourth respondent relating to the impugned order dated 06.08.2024 and that of the second respondent relating to the impugned order dated 08.08.2024, to quash the same, and to direct all the respondents to permit the petitioner to undergo the Bio-chemistry examination as the 5th attempt for the 1st Year MBBS course and to pass such further or other orders.
3. The petitioner was not able to clear the examinations in the first attempt. In the first three attempts, the petitioner cleared Physiology. In the 4th and final attempt, she wrote both Human Anatomy and Biochemistry. She cleared Human Anatomy Paper I and Paper II. As far as Biochemistry, she failed. She scored 77 marks instead of the minimum required 80 marks. Under
The court held that failing to provide reasonable accommodations to a disabled student during exams constitutes discrimination, affirming the right to equal educational opportunities.
The court established that all persons with disabilities are entitled to reasonable accommodations during examinations, ensuring no discrimination based on the nature of disability.
The quantified disability alone cannot disqualify a candidate from medical admission; functional assessment and reasonable accommodations are essential for eligibility under the Rights of Persons wit....
The court emphasized that eligibility for medical courses must be based on functional assessments rather than mere disability quantification, reinforcing the principle of reasonable accommodation for....
Quantified disability alone cannot disqualify candidates from educational opportunities; individual assessments must determine eligibility based on the ability to pursue the course.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of meeting the eligibility criteria, including the condition of both hands being intact with intact sensation, sufficient strength, ....
The court upheld the validity of amended eligibility regulations for medical admissions requiring intact limbs and functional competency, emphasizing adherence to application timelines as lawful and ....
Disability quantification should not disqualify candidates from medical education; functional competency must be assessed for eligibility.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
