Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Ravi Nath Tilhari, Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
Sree Venkateswara Bio Management Systems – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Environment, Forest, Science and Technology – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ravi Nath Tilhari, J.
Heard Sri S.V.S.S. Siva Ram, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for State respondents, Sri Y. Soma Raju, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent- A.P.Pollution Control Board and Sri Ramachandra Rao Gurram, learned counsel, representing Mr. Venkat Subbaiah Pogula, learned counsel for the unofficial respondent(s) in both the writ petitions.
2. Writ Petition No.10643 of 2024 has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 04.04.2024, passed by the 2nd respondent-the Special Chief Secretary, Department of Environment, Forest Science and Technology, Secretariat, Velagapudi in Appeal No.5 of 2024.
3. Writ Petition No.11929 of 2024 has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 04.04.2024, passed by the 1st respondent-the Special Chief Secretary, Department of Environment, Forest Science and Technology, Secretariat, Velagapudi in Appeal No.4 of 2024.
-
I. Facts in W.P.No.10643 of 2024:
4. The facts as per the petitioner’s case are that the petitioner a prospective entrepreneur intending to establish a Common Bio Medical Waste Treatment Facility (in
Court confirmed the mandatory requirement of gap analysis for the establishment of new biomedical waste facilities, emphasizing jurisdictional limitations on appellate authority and the importance of....
Jurisdiction of the High Court in entertaining a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, in spite of the alternative statutory remedies, is not affected, specially in a case where the au....
Writ jurisdiction can be denied if an alternative statutory remedy exists, and suppression of material facts must significantly impact the case's adjudication.
The National Green Tribunal must comply with principles of natural justice, ensuring parties have the opportunity to present their case before any adverse decisions are made.
The court declined to entertain the writ petition invoking the doctrine of forum conveniens, holding that the appropriate forum to consider the challenge to the NGT's orders would be the Gujarat High....
The court applied the doctrine of forum conveniens to decline to entertain the petition, holding that the appropriate forum to consider the challenge raised in the petition would be the Gujarat High ....
The court held that the petitioner has the right to challenge relocation recommendations based on potential harm to its interests, reinforcing the need for a thorough review process under environment....
The High Court retains jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution despite the establishment of specialized forums, exercising discretion in determining whether to entertain matters o....
In all matters falling with the ambit of the National Green Tribunal, it is only the jurisdiction of the National Green Tribunal which can be invoked; and the petitioners should not be permitted to i....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
