SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 782

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, J.
Tadiparthi Bapi Reddy S/o. Koti Reddy - Petitioner
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Amaravati
- Respondents
Criminal Petition No: 5785 of 2025
Decided On : 04-07-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri Venkata Mohan Rao Pathakota
For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor

Pre-arrest bail may be granted even in absence of a registered case if there is a reasonable apprehension of arrest based on specific allegations and the history of prior complaints against the petitioner.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 482 - Application for pre-arrest bail regarding unregistered crime - Petitioner fears arrest following allegations by informant, involving attempt to kill and previous complaints that were closed - Court determines that while no case registered, threat of arrest exists due to the informant's complaint dated 12.05.2025, granting bail with specific conditions. (Paras 10 to 13)

(B) Pre-arrest bail - Considerations include seriousness of the threat of arrest, prior complaints, and potential for the informant's motives in seeking arrest - Past complaints closed without action support the petitioner's case for bail. (Paras 11 and 12)

Table of Content
1. petitioner's application for pre-arrest bail. (Para 1 , 5)
2. opposition by public prosecutor and concerns over arrest. (Para 2 , 3 , 6 , 7)
3. guidance from supreme court on anticipatory bail. (Para 8 , 9)
4. lack of registered complaint against petitioner. (Para 10 , 11)
5. conditions for granting pre-arrest bail established. (Para 12 , 13)

ORDER :

A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, J.

This is an application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNNS], seeking the relief of pre-arrest bail in respect of unregistered Crime, pertaining to the Pattabhipuram Police Station, Guntur Urban District, in connection with a complaint lodged by one Veeragandham Hemalatha with several allegations including an attempt to kill her on 08.05.2025 and hence, the petitioner is afraid of danger of arrest as Police are repeatedly summoning him.

2. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the petition.

3. Heard both side extensively.

4. Point for determination:

Whether the petitioner is entitled for grant of pre-arrest bail in terms of Section 482 of BNSS , in respect of an unregistered Crime, pursuant to the complaint dated 12.05.2025? If so, on what terms?

Sequence of events:-

5. A written complaint dated 12.05.2025 annexed to the Petition was submitted by the informant to the Police with the following allegations:-

[i] “She is a widow, engaged in Textiles and real estate business. She had two children, (1) Vamsi Krishna -son and (2) Sai Priyanka - daughter. The informant got acquaintance with the petitioner herein in a marriage in connection with purchase of a flat. Thereafter, closeness developed between them. On sharing of information about the death of her husband, the petitioner assured that he will support her. Thereafter, convincing her children, he married the informant. When photos were about to be taken while tying Tali, on the pretext that petitioner is a Government employee, he stopped taking of photos. Informants all income out of the real estate business was saved with the petitioner, as he assured to return the money for her children future needs. From 2018 there was change in the behavior of the petitioner, he started beating the informant coming in drunken state. When she asked the petitioner to perform the marriage of her daughter, he did not evince any interest nor extended any financial support.

[ii] Further, in the year 2021, the petitioner got transferred to Pulivendula and at his instance her son Vamsi Krishna was sent to Pulivendula for being with the petitioner, on the assurance that he will set up some business with Vamsi Krishna. However, on 7th March 2021, at about 8.00 ‘O’ clock, the petitioner informed the informant that Vamsi Krishna is not doing well and asked her to come immediately. She along with her son-in-law and daughter went to Pulivendula. The petitioner was staying in a hotel, when they enquired him about Vamsi Krishna, he stated that Vamsi Krishna is in Government Hospital. They found Vamsi Krishna in the mortuary of the Hospital. Then a complaint was lodged by the informant.

[iii] The petitioner requested the informant not to initiate any case and sent the dead body in an ambulance. Thereafter, he was behaving well with the informant and her daughter. Later, when the informant asked to set up a business in the name of her daughter, petitioner grew wild and fisted her claiming that she can complain wherever she want, threatening that she will be killed as and how her son was killed. On 08.05.2025 when the informant approached the petitioner along with one Geetha Kumari at his office, stating them not to come at office, assured to give money and asked them to come to Guest house. When she was about to go to Guest House, he abused her as a bitch and caught hold of her neck, attempted to kill her. Hence, she approached Police to take action against the petitioner.”

Submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner:-

6. The informant is habituated to initiate co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top