SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 809

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
Manepalli Ammalu – Appellant
Versus
Kada Hareesh Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : G. Sai Narayana Rao

JUDGMENT :

A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, J.

1. Claimants in M.V.O.P.No.276 of 2015 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-II Additional District Judge, Parvatipuram (for short “the learned MACT”), questioning the dismissal of their claim petition filed the present appeal.

2. The claim was arising out of the death of Manepalli Annaji Rao (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) in a Motor Vehicle accident that occurred at A.P.S.R.T.C. complex, Salur, due to the involvement of A.P.S.R.T.C. Bus bearing No.AP 10 Z 6354 (hereinafter referred to as “the offending vehicle”) driven by Respondent No.1.

3. Claimants are the wife and the son of the deceased. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 i.e. the driver of the offending vehicle and the Shift Supervisor of the R.T.C. Depot, Salur remained ex parte.

4. Respondent Nos.3 and 4 / Depot Manager and Managing Director contested the case.

5. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be hereinafter referred to as the claimants and the Respondents as and how they are arrayed in the impugned proceedings.

Case of the claimants:

6. Deceased worked as driver in A.P.S.R.T.C. became unfit due to medical reasons and out of service from A.P.S.R.T.C. On 03.12.201

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top