Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Kiranmayee Mandava
Bollavaram Giddaiah – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. absorption request for aided vacancies. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. contentions on appointment and pay scale. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. conditions for regularization of services. (Para 7 , 11) |
| 4. equal pay for equal work principle. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. court's directive for individual applications. (Para 15) |
ORDER :
Kiranmayee Mandava, J.
Heard Sri Subramanyam Daraboina, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for School Education and Sri Mahesh Kumar Kancharla, learned counsel for the 5th respondent.
2. The issue involved in all these ten writ petitions is common, therefore, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of all the writ petitions through this common order.
3. The relief sought by the writ petitioners in the writ petition is for a direction to the 1st to 5th respondents to absorb the services of the petitioners against the aided vacancies in the respondent college.
4. The petitioners were appointed as lecturers in 5th respondent college by the appointment committee of the said college. The said appointment was pursuant to the advertisement given in the newspapers. All the petitioners were appointed in backlog vacancies reserved for SC-ST candidates. The d
The principle of equal pay for equal work applies where employees perform similar duties regardless of their appointment method; individual assessments are required for regularization claims.
Absorption into grant-in-aid posts requires adherence to legal procedures and prior approval, which were not followed in the petitioners' initial appointments.
Point of law; It is clearly clarified in this judgment also in line with the earlier judgments also that unless and until the original appointment is a “regular recruitment” in accordance with “the r....
Teachers appointed in unaided posts are entitled to consideration for absorption into aided vacancies if their appointments were valid and similar cases were absorbed.
The court established that absorption into aided posts requires individual assessment based on employment terms and adherence to selection procedures.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of employees to regularization and absorption in sanctioned posts after working for more than ten years without the benefit or prot....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for conducting regular selections for the post of Asstt. Professor in accordance with the UGC Regulations of 2010, and the emphasis....
Regularization of public employment requires adherence to established recruitment processes; negative equality cannot justify irregular appointments.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
