Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
G. Rajini – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners' claim for absorption based on equal circumstance. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. government's counter on appointments violating rules. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's analysis on petitioners' eligibility and previous rulings. (Para 5 , 10 , 16) |
| 4. orders directing consideration of absorption proposals. (Para 17) |
| 5. final decision to consider petitions without costs. (Para 18) |
ORDER :
1. This Writ Petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioners’ case for absorption in their respective aided vacancies, as per the proposal of the 5th respondent school, as was done in cases of all other similarly placed persons in the 5th respondent school and other schools.
2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:-
(a) The petitioners were appointed as Secondary Grade Teacher in the 5th respondent-School. As there exists clear aided vacancies as shown in the proposal of the 5th respondent, the petitioners’ proposals were sent by the 5th respondent. As per G.O.Ms.No.60, Education (PE) Department, dated 28.01.1986, the School (private aided) Management was given powers to appoint teachers. G.O.Ms.No.524, Education (PE) Department, dated 20.12.1998,
Teachers appointed in unaided posts are entitled to consideration for absorption into aided vacancies if their appointments were valid and similar cases were absorbed.
Absorption into aided posts requires adherence to established rules and qualifications; long service alone cannot justify irregular appointments.
The principle of parity mandates that similarly situated individuals must be treated equally in matters of service absorption and benefits.
Absorption into grant-in-aid posts requires adherence to legal procedures and prior approval, which were not followed in the petitioners' initial appointments.
The court emphasized the importance of valid reasons for absence from duties and the necessity of available vacant posts for absorption.
The principle of equal pay for equal work applies where employees perform similar duties regardless of their appointment method; individual assessments are required for regularization claims.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
