SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 594

K. MANMADHA RAO
A. Venkata Ratnam – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: J. Sudheer.

ORDER :

1. This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:

    “.......to direct the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioners and absorb them into grant in aid with effect from the date of their initial appointment or at least from the date of availability of aided vacancy in their subjects with all consequential benefits and/or to grant minimum time scale to the petitioners with effect from the date of their eligibility and entitlement with all consequential benefits and arrears by holding the action of the respondents in not absorbing them into grant-in- aid and/or not granting minimum time scale to them as bad, illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and unconstitutional, besides being inhuman and atrocious by issuance of Writ of Mandamus and pass such other order or orders.....”

2. The case of the petitioners is that all the petitioners joined as Junior Lecturers in the 4th respondent/College in unaided posts in different subject streams. They were paid meagre salary of Rs.500/- per month, and the same was increased up to Rs.9,000/-. All the petitioners are working in the aided posts in their respective subject streams since

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top