IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao, J.
Maruvada Rama Krishna, S/O. Late Maruvada Bhavani And Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State Of AP And Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No.17374 of 2023
Decided On : 02-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing for writ petition under article 226 (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. encroachment of petitioners' land (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. government response to encroachment (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. arguments presented by parties (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. constitutional right to property (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. consideration of severance in land use (Para 17) |
| 7. admission of encroachment and lack of compensation (Para 18) |
| 8. decision to allow writ petition and order for compensation (Para 19) |
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao, J.
The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief/s:
“to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the inaction of the respondents Nos. 3 to 10 as it is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violation of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14,19(1)(g), 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India in not implementing the order dated 06.12.2021 and consequently prayed to direct the respondents to pay compensation as per prevailing market value and damages including the cost of litigation to the 1st Petitioner in respect of petitioners land being illegally has been encroached without following due process of Law by the respondents to an extent of Ac.0.05 cents in Sy.No.164/2 in Peruru Village, Amalapuram Mandal, East Godavari District (presently) Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema District) and to pass such other order or orders…..
2. The Writ Petition is filed either to enforce the order of the 2nd respondent-the District Collector, dated 06.12.2021, to remove the BT road and restore possession of the petitioners’ land, or to direct the respondents to provide compensation for an area of AC.0-05 cents of land in Survey No.164/2, situated in Peruru Village, Amalapuram Mandal, East Godavari District, now within Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema District, that has been encroached upon by the respondent Nos.3 to 10.
3. Facts of the case, the petitioners asserted in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition that the 1st petitioner and his elder brother by name late Sri Kameswara Rao are the absolute owners of the land admeasuring Ac.0.19 cents each in Survey No.164/2, situated at Peruru village, Amalapuram Mandal, and the 1st petitioner is in the possession of his share of land admeasuring Ac.0-095 cents and also looking after his brother’s share. During the Covid period, the respondent Nos.6 to 9 have encroached the 1st petitioner’s land to an extent of Ac.0.05 cents in survey No.164/2 out of Ac.0-095 cents, initially laid red gravel road and later laid a B.T. road known as KANF road to Bodasakurru Bridge passing through Chintapallivaripalem of Peruru village, Amalapuram Mandal, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema District, without any notice, without following the due process of law and thereby they have encroached into the land of the 1st petitioner.
4. The 1st petitioner has approached the authorities to handover the portion of the land back to the 1st petitioner which was encroached by the respondent Nos.3 to 10, as there is no response, the 2nd petitioner who is the son of the 1st petitioner herein, filed two online applications through Spandana (1) EAG20211026336, dated 26.10.2021 and EAG20220326632, dated 26.03.2023 respectively, requesting the authorities to handover the land which is encroached by the respondent Nos.3 to 10, by removing the B.T. road, to an extent of Ac.0.05 cents of land in survey No.164/2.
5. The 9th respondent has addressed a letter vide reference No.Spandana/Peruru/A.E/Amalapuram/2021, dated 29.11.2021 to the 3rd respondent to get the survey done immediately and to submit a report in respect of survey No.164/1, which is R&B land and Survey No.164/2, which is the 1st petitioner’s land, as against the petitioners’ application through Spandana, dated 26.10.2021. The 2nd respondent- District Collector, through proceedings dated 06.12.2021, in pursuance of the application made by the 2nd
The court affirmed that property rights must be protected by law, emphasizing due process in cases of land encroachment and the necessity for just compensation under constitutional provisions.
No writ relief for encroachment removal without proof of public land vesting; civil court for easement rights.
Authorities must survey and remove public land encroachments via due process within stipulated time.
Mandamus directs authorities to survey and remove encroachments on public pathway land following due process.
Court can direct authorities to consider pending representations without adjudicating merits, ensuring compliance with principles of natural justice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.