SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(AP) 81

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
NYAPATHY VIJAY, J.
Mirshikari Mohammed Sameer Ali, S/o Mirshikari Fazeel Basha – Appellant 
Versus  
The State of AP, Rep. By its Principal Secretary, School Education Department Secretariat
WRIT PETITION NO: 3132/2026
Decided on : 18-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : J.JYOTHI

Name changes in educational certificates require adherence to reasonable procedures, allowing corrections based on legal identity documents without excessive restrictions.

Headnote:(A) G.O.Ms.No.1263, dated 06.05.1961 - Correction of names in S.S.C. Certificates - Petition challenging rejection of name change request due to alleged illegality and arbitrariness. (Paras 1, 5, 11)

(B) Legal principles governing corrections in educational certificates emphasize that reasonable limitations should be respected without imposing excessive restrictions. (Paras 9, 10)

(C) Court findings assert that G.O. governs date of birth changes but lacks relevance for name corrections under new statutory framework. (Paras 8, 10)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner, after passing X Class in 2017, sought correction from erroneously listed name to actual surname, supported by Gazette notification. Previous name was incorrect as evidenced by father's identification documents.

Findings of Court:
Respondent bound to make corrections in S.S.C. Certificate for the petitioner, acknowledging the legitimacy of the request and procedural improprieties in denial.

Issues: Was denial of name change lawful given statutory developments? Did G.O.Ms.No.1263 restrict necessary corrections?

Ratio Decidendi: Court ruled that historical G.O. did not apply under current academic authorities' provisions, emphasizing the illegitimacy of operational constraints imposed by the Education Department.

Result: Writ Petition allowed, orders for correction issued.

Table of Content
1. questioning rejection of name change request. (Para 1 , 5)
2. petitioner asserts factual inaccuracies in certificates. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. arguments regarding correction procedures. (Para 6 , 7)
4. analysis of correction mechanisms and relevance. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
5. obligation to implement correction requests. (Para 11)
6. final ruling to allow changes in certificates. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)

ORDER:

NYAPATHY VIJAY, J.

1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the Proceedings issued by Respondent No.2 vide R.C.No.APOSS-14021(45)/137/2025- Exams EC-APOSS, dated 20.12.2025 rejecting the request of the Petitioner for change of his surname and his father’s surname name in S.S.C., Certificate, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the Petitioner herein had passed X Class Public Examination conducted in April, 2017 by the Andhra Pradesh Open School Society (APOSS). In the S.S.C., Certificate issued to the Petitioner, the name of the Petitioner was erroneously mentioned as “Shaik Mohammed Sameer Ali” and his father’s name as “S. Mohammed Fazeel Basha”. The Petitioner states that his surname is “Mirshikari”, instead “Shaik” was prefixed to the name of the Petitioner and his father in the S.S.C., Certificate and sought for change.

3. It is stated that the father of the Petitioner is a Government Officer belonging to Group-I Services of Andhra Pradesh and his name was recorded in his service records as “Mirshikari Fazeel Basha” and also in all other identity proofs such as Aadhar Card, PAN Card and Voter ID Card etc.,

4. As an abundant caution, the Petitioner had also got the name corrected asMirshikari Mohammed Sameer Ali, S/o Mirshikari Fazeel Basha” in the Andhra Pradesh Gazette published on 15.09.2023. Thereafter, the Petitioner submitted a representation enclosing the revised copies of Aadhar Cards of the Petitioner and his father to the Respondent-School and the copy of Gazette Notification for correction of his surname and the surname of his father in the S.S.C., Certificate.

5. It is stated that the said application was rejected referring to G.O.Ms.No.1263, Education Department, dated 06.05.1961 stating that corrections shall not be entertained in the original pass certificates on the basis of A.P. Gazette Notification. Hence, the present Writ Petition is filed.

6. The learned counsel for the Petitioner M/s. J. Jyothi would submit that G.O.Ms.No.1263, dated 06.05.1961 does not bar corrections in the certificates but only mentions the procedure for correction of date of birth, name, surname and father’s name etc., In support of her contention, the learned counsel for the Petitioner relied upon the Judgment of the Supreme Court in Jigya Yadav (Minor) through Guardian/Father Hari v. Central Board of Secondary Education and Others, (2021) 7 SCC 535 The learned Assistant Government Pleader for School Education would submit that the Petitioner’s S.S.C., Certificate is pertaining to the year 2017 and at this length of time, corrections are impermissible.

7. Heard the respective counsel.

8. G.O.Ms.No.1263, dated 06.05.1961 provides for mechanism for change of date of birth in a completed S.S.L.C., Certificate but not name, surname and father’s name etc. This G.O., pertains to the period wherein Government was responsible for S.S.C., Certificates and may not have relevance as the APOSS i.e., authority who issues the S.S.C., Certificate was incorporated much later under the Societies Registration Act.

9. A similar issue fell for consideration before the Supreme Court in Jigya Yadav (Minor) through Guardian/Father Hari v. Central Board of Secondary Education and Others (supra), wherein the Supreme Court held that there is no reason for the CBSE to turn down such request or attach any precondition for correction of name, except reasonable period of limitation and keeping in mind the period for which the CBSE has to maintain its record under the extant regulations.

The excessive fetters for change of name

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top