SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(AP) 171

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO, T.C.D. SEKHAR, JJ.
M/S Shilpa Medicare Limited - Petitioner 
Versus
Union Of India, Represented By Its Secretary Ministry Of Finance (Department Of Revenue) – Respondents
W.P.No.15955 of 2021
Decided On : 31-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri V. Raghuraman, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Anil Kumar Bezawada
For the Respondents: Sri P.S.P. Suresh Kumar.

Transfer of an entire business as a going concern does not constitute taxable supply under GST; input tax credit can transfer under specified conditions.

Headnote:(A) Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Sections 7(1)(a), 7(1)(c), and 18(3) - Transfer of business assets - The transaction in question was ruled as non-taxable as it constituted a transfer of a business as a going concern, not a supply of goods or services - The authority held that input tax credit can be transferred in the event of a merger. (Paras 8-24)

(B) Taxation - Definition of supply - The court emphasized that only sales in the course of business are taxable; transfer of entire business not considered as such under prevailing provisions of the Acts. (Paras 10-16)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought clarification regarding the tax liability on transferring its R&D unit from Andhra Pradesh to Karnataka without consideration and whether input tax credits could be transferred. (Paras 2-4)

Findings of Court:
The appellate authority's ruling was set aside, determining that the transfer was not taxable and input tax credits could be transferred subject to authority's review. (Paras 24)

Issues: Whether the business transfer amounted to taxable supply, whether exemptions apply, and transfer of input tax credit. (Paras 4, 10-16)

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the transfer of an entire business as a going concern does not constitute a taxable event; the definition of supply excludes such transfer. (Paras 10-20)

Result: Writ Petition allowed, ruling set aside.

Table of Content
1. details of the petitioner's business and transfer agreement. (Para 2 , 3)
2. ruling by the authority for advance ruling and subsequent appeal. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. arguments of the petitioner regarding the tax status of the transfer. (Para 8)
4. counterarguments from the deputy commissioner regarding tax implications. (Para 9)
5. legal definitions of supply under the cgst act. (Para 10 , 11)
6. past rulings impacting definition of business transfer. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
7. exemption of transfer of business as a service under gst. (Para 16 , 17)
8. interpretation of provisions for input tax credit transfer. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
9. discretion of court on inter-state input tax credit. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
10. final ruling of the court. (Para 24)

Order :

R.Raghunandan Rao, J.

Heard Sri V. Raghuraman, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Anil Kumar Bezawada, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.S.P. Suresh Kumar, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.

2. The petitioner herein is a limited company which undertakes Research and Development in Pharmaceuticals including active pharmaceutical ingredients, formulation of molecules and manufacture of formulation products. The petitioner had one Research and Development Center situated in Karnataka State and another in Modavalasa Village, Denkada Mandal, Vizianagaram District of Andhra Pradesh. The unit in Vizianagaram was registered under the GST Act with Registration No.37AADCS8788F1ZR. Similarly, the Bangalore Unit of the petitioner was also registered, in the State of Karnataka, with GST No.29AADCS8788F1ZO. The petitioner had been allotted a Permanent Account Number, under the Income Tax Act, bearing PAN No.AADCS8788F. The petitioner decided to transfer its R&D Center in Vizianagaram to Bangalore. For this purpose, the Vizianagaram Unit as well as the Bangalore Unit entered into a Business Transfer Agreement, dated 26.06.2019. Under this agreement, the business assets and business liability of the Vizianagaram Unit, as a going concern, was transferred to the Bangalore Unit for Zero consideration. The R&D business undertaking, which was the subject matter of the transfer, was defined, under the business transfer agreement of 26.06.2019 in the following manner:

R&D Business Undertaking" means the undertaking of the R&D Business consisting of the following:

a) Movable Property of the R&D Business Undertaking As a part of Annex-1.

b) All Assets Book debts, advances, deposits, receivables as per books of record on the date of transfer.

c) All Liabilities including statutory on the date of transfer.

d) All Employees to this Agreement, on the same terms and conditions of service as they are employed by the Transferor, including as to length and continuity of service including long term & short Term benefit.

e) Books, Records and Ledgers: Customer contracts, know-how, brands and other Intangibles, as may be mutually agreed between the Parties and;

f) Technical or other information if any used primarily in connection with (a) to (e) above and as agreed between the Parties on or prior to the Closing Date.

3. After executing this agreement, the petitioner had approached the Authority for Advance Ruling for a ruling, on the following three questions:

1. Whether the transaction would amount to supply of goods or supply of services or supply of Goods & Services?"

2. Whether the transaction would be covered Sl.No.2 of the Notification No.12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.6.2017?

3. Can we file GST ITC-02 return and transfer unutilized ITC from Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh unit to Bengaluru, Karnataka Unit?

4. The authority for advance ruling by its decision, dated 24.02.2020, in AAR No.05/AP/GST/2020, had held that the transaction was a supply of services, which was covered under SL.No.2 of Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), exempting the said transaction from tax. The authority also held in the affirmative, that the unutilized input tax credit ava

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top