SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Kar) 224

M.RAMAKRISHNA RAO, M.F.SALDANHA
SHAIK MOHIDDIN – Appellant
Versus
SECTION OFFICER, KARNATAKA ELECTRICITY BOARD, KAIWARA – Respondent


Advocates:
B.R.Vishwanath, N.K.Gupta

( 1 ) IN these three contempt petitions under Sections 10, 11, and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (the Act for short), the complainants have sought to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents/ accused and to punish them in accordance with law of disobedience of the orders made by the subordinate Courts.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts of the case necessary for the disposal of the these cases are as follows :-THE complainant in C. C. C. No. 605 of 1994 filed a suit in O. S. No. 92 of 1993 on the file of the Munsiff, Chintamani, for a declaration that the notice in No. FA-K1p-652-53 dated 28-1-1993 issued by the respondent herein was illegal and for permanent injunction restraining him from disconnecting the electricity to installation No. KIP 19 of Chinnasandra village belonging to the complainant. After the notice was served, on the undertaking given by the respondent, the Court by its order dated 25-2-1993 directed not to disconnect power to the said installation of the complainant. To circumvent the aforesaid undertaking, it is alleged, the respondent issued another notice dated 21-12-1993 which was the subject matter of W. P. No. 1181 of 1994 filed by the complainant and






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top