SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 436

KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION STAFF – Respondent


Advocates:
A.N.JAYARAM, ASHOK HARANAHAFLI, M.C.Narasimhan, NARAYANA SWAMY, RATNA N.SHIVAYOGIMATH

P. VISHWANATHA SHETTY, J.

( 1 ) IN these appeals, the appellant has called in question the correctness of the order dated march 20, 2000 made in Writ Petition Nos. 7601 to 7603 of 1997 by the learned single judge (Karnataka State Road Transport corporation Staff and Workers' Federation, bangalore and Others v. Karnataka State Road transport Corporation, Bangalore and another), 2000-III-LLJ (Supp)-1366 (Kant) wherein he has struck down Regulation 9 (5) and 9 (6) of the Karnataka State Road Transport corporation Servants (Conduct and Discipline) regulations, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Regulations') on the ground that the said] regulations are violative of the rights guaranteed to the petitioners under Article 19 (1) (c) of the Constitution.

( 2 ) THE appellant in this appeal is the, karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'the Corporation' ). The 1st respondent is the Karnataka State Road transport Corporation Staff and Workers' federation (hereinafter referred. to as 'the federation') and the respondents 2 and 3 are the members of the Federation in the cadre of superintendent and Security Guard in the establishment of the Corporation. The re














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top