SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Kar) 1341

B.VEERAPPA, K.NATARAJAN
Ramu – Appellant
Versus
Jnanabharathi Police – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vijayakumar Majage, Advocate, A.V. Raghavendra, Advocate

JUDGMENT

B.Veerappa, J. - The unsuccessful accused persons, who have gang raped P.W.28 - Kumari Prakruti (not her real name) have filed these appeals (Criminal Appeal No.246/2014 by accused Nos.2, 5 to 8; Criminal Appeal No.690/2020 by accused No.3 and Criminal Appeal No.867/2020 by accused No.4) against the impugned judgments and orders of conviction dated 4th September, 2013 made in S.C.No.487/2013 and 22nd May, 2017 made in S.C. No.29/2014 on the file of the IX and LIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru respectively convicting all accused persons for the offences punishable under Sections 376 (2)(g) r/w Section 149 , 323, 324, 366, 427, 506(B), 397 of IPC., and sentencing them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each for the offence punishable under Section 376 (2)(g) r/w 149 of IPC; one year for the offence punishable under Section 323 of IPC; three years for the offence punishable under Section 324 of IPC; ten years and fine of Rs.1,000/- each for the offence punishable under Section 366 of IPC; two years for the offence punishable under Section 427 of IPC., Seven years for the offence punishable under Section 506(B) of IPC., and se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top