IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
Alok Aradhe, M.G.S. Kamal, JJ.
Bangalore Development Authority – Petitioner
Versus
Offshore Holdings Pvt. Ltd. And Ors. – Respondents
W.A. NO.1966 OF 2013 (BDA) IN W.P. NO.41352 OF 2001 (BDA)
Decided On : 07-04-2021
Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 17(1) and 17(3) - Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11-A, 48(1) and 36(3) - Seeking compensation - Acquisition of land - Whether or not the scheme has lapsed - Guntas of land including the land bearing for formation of Rajmahal Vilas II Stage Layout - State Government thereafter published final Notification under Section 19 of the 1976 Act. It is pertinent to note out of 3 acres and 17 guntas of land –
Finding of the Court: Learned Single Judge on the aforesaid issue, Court refrain from examining aforesaid issue at instance of respondent who was the petitioner before the learned Single Judge, in intra court appeal - Authority has subsequently passed a resolution rescinding previous resolution action of passing of the second resolution cannot be termed as a fraud / over reach on the part of authority - It is also relevant to note neither any averment has been made in the writ petition scheme has lapsed under Section 27 of 1976 Act, nor aforesaid issue has been dealt with the learned Single Judge, therefore –
Result: Appeal is allowed
JUDGMENT :
ALOK ARADHE, J.
In this appeal preferred under Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 the appellants (hereinafter referred to as the 'Authority' for short) have assailed the validity of the order dated 14.12.2012 by which learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition preferred by respondent No.1 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Company' for short) and proceeding for acquisition of the land initiated for benefit of the authority has been quashed. In order to appreciate the authority's challenge to the impugned order, few facts need mention, which are stated hereinafter.
FACTS:
2. Land bearing Sy.No.9/2 situate in Lottegollahalli Village, Bangalore North Taluk measuring 3 acres and 17 guntas was recorded in the revenue records in the names of Uttanallappa, S.Narimaiah, Muniswamappa, M.Narasimhappa and Hanumaiah (hereinafter referred to as 'the owners of the land' for short). The Authority issued a preliminary Notification under Section 17(1) and 17(3) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1976 Act' for short) for acquisition of 1316.04 and 1/2 guntas of land including the land bearing Sy.No.9/2 for formation of Rajmahal Vilas II Stage Layout. The State Government thereafter published final Notification under Section 19 of the 1976 Act. It is pertinent to note that out of 3 acres and 17 guntas of land, which was notified, 0.29 guntas of land was acquired by the Railways for formation of Mysore-Salem Railway line, an extent of 0.34 guntas were utilized by the authority for formation of Ring Road and 0.32 guntas of land was a built up area. Land measuring 1 acre and 2 guntas of Sy.No.9/2 is the subject matter of this appeal.
3. The owners of the land made applications on 20.12.1981 seeking compensation. Thereafter, they filed an a writ petition viz., W.P.No.16065-69/1987 before this court in which challenge was made to the proceedings initiated for acquisition of the land. During the pendency of the writ petition, the owners of the land on 18.06.1988 submitted a representation to the authority for deleting the land from acquisition proceedings. The Authority vide resolution dated 28.06.1988 resolved to recommend to the State Government to de-notify the land measuring 1 acre and 2 guntas. The Authority forwarded the recommendation to the State Government for appropriate action. The owners of the land on 22.09.1988 filed a memo seeking to withdraw the writ petition and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn on 22.09.1988. The State Government by a communication dated 26.12.1988 requested the Authority to send the status report of the case. The Authority by a communication dated 03.05.1989 informed the government about the withdrawal of the writ petition.
4. The Deputy Commissioner of the Authority by an endorsement dated 11.03.1991 issued to one M.Ramaiah informed him that in view of resolution No.1084 dated 28.06.1988, no acquisition proceedings are pending in respect of land in question. The State Government by a communication dated 16.02.1993 informed the Authority that file relating to de-Notification of the land in question is closed and directed the Authority to send a fresh proposal if it so chooses. Thereafter, by five sale deeds executed on 22.05.1985 and three sale deeds executed on 30.06.1998, the owners of the land sold the land to the company. The Authority vide resolution No.325/97 passed on 31.12.1997 resolved to rescind the earlier resolution No.874 dated 28.06.1988. Thereafter, a permission was granted by the authority to the company on 22.05.1996 to accord permission to construct culvert / bridge on an adjoining land, subject to terms and conditions mentioned in the aforesaid communication. The Land Acquisition Officer passed an award on 09.03.1998 in pursuance of which, according to the authority, the possession of the land in question was taken
B.L.Mandawat Vs. Union of India
B.Venkataswamy Reddy Vs. State
Balram Singh Vs. Bhikam Chand Jain
Balwant Narayan Bhagde Vs. M.D.Bhagwat
Banda Development Authoirty Vs. Motilal Agarwal
Bhavnagar University Vs. Palitana Sugar Mill (P.) Ltd.
Bondu Ramaswamy Vs. Banaglore Development Authority
Chairman, Indore Vikas Vs. Pure Industrial Cock and Chem. Ltd.
Delhi Cloth and General Mills Ltd. Vs. Uniono F India
Gunwant Kaur Vs. Municipal Committee, Bhatinda
Harish Chandra Raj Singh Vs. Dy. Land Acquisition Officer
Jai Narain Parasrampuria Vs. Pushpa Devi Saraf
Jamal Uddin Ahmad Vs. Abu Saleh Najmuddin
Jet Ply Wood (P) Ltd and Another Vs. Madhukar Nowlakha and Others
K.T.Plantation Private Limited Vs. State of Karnataka
Khadim Hussain Vs. State of U.P.
Krishnaswami Vs. Union of India
Larsen and Toubro Ltd Vs. State of Gujarat and Others
Laxmanrao Kristrao Vs. Provincial Government of Bombay
Mohamadsarif Hakimji Chippa Vs. State of Gujarat
Mysore Urban Development Authority Vs. Veer Kumar Jain
Offshore Holdings Private Limited Vs. Bangalore Development Authority
P.K.Kalburqi Vs. State of Karnataka
Periya Angammal Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Prahlad Singh and Others Vs. Union of India & Others
Ravi Yashwant Bhoir Vs. Collector
Sarguja Transport Service Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Mp Gwalior & Others
Saroj Anand Vs. Prahlad Rai Anand
Securities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Prebon Yamane (India) Limited
Sita Ram Bhandar Society Vs. Govt. (Nct of Delhi)
Sriniwas Ramnath Khatod Vs. State of Maharashtra
State of Punjab Vs. Nestle India Ltd.
State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Seshachalam
Sulochana Chandrakant Galande Vs. Pune Municipal Transport & Others
Union of India Vs. Godfrey Philips India Ltd.
Union of India Vs. Karthick Chandra
Vasanth Kumar Radha Kishan Vora Vs. Board of Trustees of The Port of Bombay
Ved Gupta Vs. M/S Apsara Theatres, Jammu and Another
Velagapudi Kanaka Durga Vs. District Collector, Krishna District Chilakapudi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.