ORDER :

1. The petitioner in Criminal Revision Petition No. 1612/2016 was accused No. 1 and petitioner in Criminal Revision Petition No. 1613/2016 was accused No. 2 in C.C. No. 17019/2011, in the Court of the learned II Addl.Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, (hereinafter for brevity referred to as ‘trial Court’) wherein respondent No. 2 in both the Criminal Revision Petitions was the complainant. Along with present petitioners, one Sri Subbanna, who is said to be the husband of accused No. 2 and father of accused No. 1 was also arraigned as accused No. 3, however, lis pendence before the trial Court, accused No. 3 having reported to be demised, the case against him stood abated. The accused Nos. 1 and 2 were tried by the trial Court for the offences punishable under Section 498-A read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter for brevity referred to as ‘IPC’) and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (hereinafter for brevity referred to as ‘D.P. Act’). By its impugned judgment dated 05.09.2013, the trial Court convicted accused Nos. 1 and 2 for the offences punishable under Section 498-A read with Section 34 of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of D.P. Act. On