SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 294

H. P. SANDESH
Thippeswamy – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Sri V. Lakshmi Kanth Rao, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Sri Vinayaka V.S, HCGP.

ORDER :

1. This petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail of the petitioner in Crime No.103/2021 of Jagalur Police Station, Davanagere, for the offence punishable under Sections 363 and 376(2)(n) of IPC, Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act CPOCSO Act' for short) and Sections 9 and 11 of the Prohibition of the Child Marriage Act.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State.

3. The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution is that the complainant, who is the father of the victim girl, filed a complaint stating that his daughter Padmavathi, who is aged about 16 years is pursuing SSLC. That on 14.06.2021, he went to the land for work and his daughter was alone in the house. When he came back from work, she was not in the house and they have searched in the house of her relatives and friends and she was not there and hence suspected the role of the petitioner and gave the complaint. Based on the complaint, the police have registered the case for the offence punishable under Section 363 of IPC. Thereafter, during the course of investigation, secured

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top