IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P.Sandesh, J.
Harisha - Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka - Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 5619/2022
Decided On : 01-07-2022
Regular Bail - Sexual Offences - Minor Victim - Marriage - POCSO Act - Prohibition of Child Marriage Act
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought regular bail for the offences of subjecting a minor victim to sexual acts and marrying her, invoking various sections of the IPC, POCSO Act, and Prohibition of Child Marriage Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the victim was subjected to sexual acts only after the marriage, as per her 164 statement, and that the petitioner should be granted bail with certain conditions to protect the interest of the prosecution.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner should be granted bail considering the allegations of subjecting a minor to sexual acts and child marriage.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the victim's statement, the timing of the sexual acts in relation to the marriage, and the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case in deciding to grant bail.
Final Decision: The petition for regular bail was allowed, and the petitioner was granted bail with specific conditions to safeguard the prosecution's interest.
JUDGMENT
1. This petition is filed under Sec. 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail of the petitioner in Crime No.300/2021 of Bagepalli Police Station, Chikkaballapura, for the offence punishable under Ss. 363 and 376(2)(n) of IPC, Ss. 4, 6 and 17 of POCSO Act and Ss. 9 and 10 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State.
3. The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution is that this petitioner subjected the minor victim girl for sexual act against her wish and also got married her on 21/9/2021. Hence, the police have invoked the offence under Ss. 363 and 376(2)(n) of IPC, Ss. 4, 6 and 17 of POCSO Act and Ss. 9 and 10 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that both the petitioner and the victim were loving each other and both of them went to Hindupura Town, Andhra Pradesh and not subjected her for sexual act prior to marriage and only after the marriage on 21/9/2021, she was subjected to sexual act and 164 statement of the victim girl also discloses that after the marriage, they lived as husband and wife.
5. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State would submit that, in order to show that the victim was subjected to sexual act prior to marriage, no material is placed before the Court. However, the victim girl in her 164 statement states that she was subjected to sexual act after the marriage on 21/9/2021.
6. Having heard the respective counsel and also on perusal of the material available on record, the victim girl went along with the petitioner to Hindupura Town, Andhra Pradesh and though allegation is made in the charge-sheet that on the same day, she was subjected to sexual act in the night in the lodge, but on perusal of the 164 statement of the victim girl, the same discloses that she was not subjected to sexual act prior to marriage and only after the marriage on 21/9/2021 in Yoga Narasimhaswamy Temple, she was subjected to sexual act and they lived as husband and wife.
7. Having taken note of the 164 statement of the victim girl and considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and though the victim is a minor, this petitioner subjected her for sexual act only after the marriage, it is a fit case to exercise the powers under Sec. 439 of Cr.P.C., subject to imposing certain conditions to protect and safeguard the interest of the prosecution. Hence, I pass the following:-
ORDER
The Petition is allowed. Consequently, the petitioner/accused shall be released on bail in Crime No.300/2021 of Bagepalli Police Station, Chikkaballapura, for the offence punishable under Ss. 363 and 376(2)(n) of IPC, Ss. 4, 6 and 17 of POCSO Act and Ss. 9 and 10 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, subject to the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall execute personal bond for a sum of Rs.2, 00, 000.00 (Rupees Two Lakhs only) with two sureties for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.
(ii) The petitioner shall not indulge in tampering the prosecution witnesses.
(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional Court on all the future hearing dates, unless exempted by the Court for any genuine cause.
(iv) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Trial Court without prior permission of the Court, till the case registered against him is disposed of.
The timing of the sexual acts in relation to the marriage and the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case influenced the court's decision to grant bail.
The timing of the sexual act in relation to the marriage is crucial in determining the applicability of certain offences and the grant of bail.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the nature of the relationship between the victim and the petitioner, including the validity of the marriage and allegations of forced love an....
The court considered the victim girl's 164 statement, completion of investigation, and charge-sheet filing in allowing the petitioner's bail application in a case involving offences under IPC, POCSO ....
The gravity of the offense, evidence of forcible sexual acts, and the victim's age are crucial factors in determining bail applications in cases involving minors and sexual offenses.
The court considered the victim's consistent allegations, medical evidence, and pending DNA report in rejecting the bail petition.
The court considered the victim's conflicting statements, her age, and the circumstances of her marriage in granting bail to the accused, highlighting the importance of evaluating the totality of cir....
The court established that under the Cr.P.C., bail may be granted when the nature of allegations does not warrant continued custody, especially when the investigation is complete.
The court considered the changed circumstances and lack of evidence in favor of the prosecution in allowing the bail petition.
The credibility of the victim's statements and the weight given to different statements made by the victim before the police and under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. were crucial in determining the prima fac....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.