IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J.
ITI Limited A Company Incorporated Under The Companies Act – Appellant
Versus
Alphion Corporation In The State Of Delaware – Respondent
Commercial Suit No. 1 of 2022
Decided on : 09-09-2022
Companies Act - A&C Act - Section 34(2)(a)(iv), (iii), (2)(b)(ii), (2)(a)(v), 7, 37, 17(1)(ii)(e), 7(4)(b), (c), 28(3), (1)(b), 31, A, 37 - Contract Act, 1872 - Section 10 and 23 - Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 57(1), 45 and 84 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order 6 Rule 2 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 14 - Tender - Arbitrator - Make Payment of Dues - Whether there was an obligation on part of ITI to make payment of amounts without BSNL making payment - Whether ITI has failed to comply with any obligation - Whether it should be dealt with in one arbitral proceedings between one set of parties or it should be dealt with in separate or parallel arbitration proceedings - Whether award comes under mischief of Section 34(2)(A)(iv) of A&C Act on account of order dealing with disputes not contemplated or not falling within terms of submissions - Whether award in question comes within mischief of Section 32(2)(B)(ii) of A&C Act on account of award being in conflict with Public Policy of India - Whether impugned award is in violation of fundamental Public Policy of India and is required to be set-aside under Section 34(2)(b)(ii) Explanation (1)(ii) of A&C Act - Whether award falls foul of Section 34(2)(a)(v) of A&C Act on account of composition of arbitral Tribunal and or arbitral procedure not being in accordance with terms of Arbitration Agreement - Whether arbitral award is in contravention of Section 34(2)(a)(iii) of A&C Act - Whether arbitral award suffers from lack of reasons and is in violation of Section 31 of A&C Act - Whether arbitral award is in violation of Section 28(2) of A&C Act on ground that arbitral Tribunal has applied principles of equity. [Para 38]
Finding of the Court: A discretion has been vested in this court under said Section 31A of A&C Act to determine as to whether costs are to be payable, amount of such cost and when such costs are to be paid - In terms of explanation to Section 31A(1) cost shall mean reasonable cost relating to proceedings - For purpose of determining cost, this Court is required to have due regard to in terms of Subsection (3) of Section 31A of A&C Act conduct of parties, whether party has succeeded partly in case, whether party has made frivolous counter claim leading to delay in disposal, etc - In present case, conduct of ITI has already been dealt with hereinabove - Many of submissions which have been made and contentions which have been raised have been deprecated - All contentions which have been raised by ITI have been rejected – Court is of considered opinion that present proceedings are frivolous in nature - Most of arguments being on basis of BSNL being a party or not which is an hogwash - Considering conduct of ITI, considering that ITI has failed in proceedings, considering that frivolous contentions have been raised, Court is of considered opinion that reasonable costs pertaining present proceedings are required to be awarded to Alphion - Considering number of time that matter has been taken up by this Court, nominal cost of Rs.5,00,000/-is awarded to Alphion - ITI is directed to make payment of same within a period of four weeks from today and file necessary acknowledgement with registry of this Court - No grounds have been made out under section 34 of A&C Act.
Result: Suit dismissed.
ORDER :
1. The Petitioner/Plaintiff is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
WHEREFORE, in light of the above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to:
A. Set aside the Arbitral Award dated 07.10.2021 passed by the Sole Arbitrator, the Second Respondent herein, in entirety;
B. Call for records of the arbitration proceeding from the Second Respondent; and,
C. Grant such other orders or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems just and equitable, including costs of the proceedings.
2. The Respondent herein was the Claimant before the Arbitral Tribunal. The Respondent had sought for the following reliefs before the Tribunal:
109. In the above facts and circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Arbitral Tribunal may graciously be pleased to pass:
b. an Award directing the respondent to pay interest @10% per annum from the due date till 14 December 2020 in the sum of INR 38,67,68,675.32 (Rupees Thirty Eight Crores sixty seven lakhs sixty eight thousand six hundred and seventy five and paise thirty two only);
c. an Award directing the respondent to pay pendente lite and future interest @ 10% per annum from 14 December 2020 till the date of actual realization;
d. an Award of costs in favour of the claimant; and
e. such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Arbitral Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.
3. Alphion Corporation who is the Respondent herein was the Claimant before the arbitral Tribunal and is hereinafter referred to as Alphion and/or Claimant; ITI Limited who is the plaintiff in this proceeding was the respondent before the Arbitral Tribunal and is hereinafter referred to as ITI Limited and/or respondent.
4. Alphion claims to be a leading provider of Broadband solutions for business and communities supporting large Network Operators, Small and medium Enterprises and community Networks with latest fiber Optic and Broadband Access technologies which develops, manufactures and sells Telecommunication products and provides after-sale services. It is stated that Alphion and ITI had entered into a Technical Collaboration Agreement dated 26.10.2007 [hereinafter for brevity referred to as ‘TCA’] whereunder the parties wanted to explore the various business opportunities available in India to supply the products listed in the TCA.
5. Alphion and ITI being interested in jointly pursuing such business opportunities with a view to manufacture, market and/or sell, install, commission and maintain contract projects for Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited [BSNL], Mahanagar Telecom Nigam Limited [MTNL] and other mutually agreeable telecom services providers worldwide.
6. In terms of the TCA, Alphion and ITI were to cooperate and coordinate with each other to market the products, the term of the TCA being seven years. It was the responsibility of Alphion to ensure that the contract products complied with the applicable tender/specification and it was the obligation of ITI to assemble and manufacture the contracted projects for the purpose of marketing and supplying the same, as regards which a non-exclusive, nontransferable, non-sublicensable license was issued by Alphion to ITI. Apart therefrom there are various terms and conditions which were agreed upon in the TCA for the purpose of achieving the aforesaid object.
7. The purpose of execution of the TCA apparently was for the reason that ITI being a public sector undertaking would have a Reservation Quota (RQ) and a Tender Quantity (TQ) in respect of tenders which are issued by other public sector undertakings within the
ONGC Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd. [(2003) 5 SCC 705]
Pure Helium India (P) Ltd. v. ONGC [(2003) 8 SCC 593]
Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals Ltd. v. Eastern Engg. Enterprises
Ssangyong Engg. & Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI
State of U.P. v. Allied Constructions [(2003) 7 SCC 396]
SEI Adhavan Power (P) Ltd. v. Jinneng Clean Energy Technology Ltd.
Sudarsan Trading Co. v. Govt. of Kerala [(1989) 2 SCC 38
Sui Southern Gas Co. Ltd. v. Habibullah Coastal Power Co. (Pte) Ltd.
Vidya Drolia v. Durga Trading Corpn.
U.P. SEB v. Searsole Chemicals Ltd. [(2001) 3 SCC 397]
Ameet Lalchand Shah v. Rishabh Enterprises
Alopi Parshad & Sons Ltd. v. Union of India
Associated Engg. Co. v. Govt. of A.P.
Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. v. Annapurna Construction
Chloro Controls (India) (P) Ltd. v. Severn Trent Water Purification Inc.
Continental Construction Co. Ltd. v. State of M.P.
D.D. Sharma v. Union of India [(2004) 5 SCC 325]
DDA v. R.S. Sharma and Co. [(2008) 13 SCC 80]
Dyna Technologies (P) Ltd. v. Crompton Greaves Ltd.
Food Corporation of India v. Chandu Construction
Gas Authority of India Ltd. v. Keti Construction (I) Ltd.
Giriraj Garg v. Coal India Ltd.
Gherulal Parakh v. Mahadeodas Maiya [1959 Supp (2) SCR 406 : AIR 1959 SC 781
Grid Corpn. of Orissa Ltd. v. Balasore Technical School [(2000) 9 SCC 552 : AIR 1999 SC 2262]
Hari Shanker Jain v. Sonia Gandhi reported in [(2001)8 SCC 233
Ispat Engg. & Foundry Works v. Steel Authority of India Ltd. [(2001) 6 SCC 347
Lesotho Highlands Development Authority v. Impregilo SpA
MTNL v. Canara Bank reported in [(2020)12 SCC 767]
McDermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd.
Section 28(1)(b) of A&C Act is reproduced as Rules applicable to substance of dispute Where the place of arbitration is situate in India.
The court can set aside an arbitral award under Section 34 if it violates substantive law, contract terms, or public policy, especially when procedural requirements aren't met or if the award is pate....
The court affirmed that an entity can claim compensation for work performed under a non-finalized contract if the work was conducted at the direction of another party, underscoring the principle of q....
Clauses in contracts that prohibit claims for damages are against public policy and void under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, as they undermine the sanctity of contracts.
(1) Appeal against modified arbitral award – Merits of award are only to be gone into, if award is demonstrated to be contrary to public policy of India.(2) Arbitral proceedings are per se not compar....
The court affirmed that claims for breach of contract are subject to statutory limitation periods, which cannot be extended by claims of continuing breaches.
The arbitration agreement's validity is independent of stamp duty on the substantive contract, and courts have limited grounds for interfering with arbitral awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.