SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 828

H. P. SANDESH
Kishore Kumar – Appellant
Versus
K. Shamala – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Nalini Jayanthi R, Advocate, for the Petitioner

JUDGMENT

H.P. Sandesh, J. - This matter is listed for admission.

This revision petition is filed to set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 30.11.2021 passed by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mysuru in Crl. A. No. 185/2020 and in consequence, the interim order dated 19.11.2020 passed on I.A. filed under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 in Crl. Misc. No. 42/2016 on the file of the III Additional I Civil Judge and JMFC, Mysuru.

2. The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution is that the respondent herein has filed an application under Section 23 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 seeking interim maintenance of Rs. 50,000/- per month. The Trial Court, after considering the material on record, particularly, the format of affidavit of assets, income and expenditure, awarded an amount of Rs. 20,000/- per month. Being aggrieved by the said order, an appeal is filed in Crl. A. No. 185/2020, wherein the format of affidavit of assets, income and expenditure is also filed before the Appellate Court. The Apex Court also, in the judgment in the case of Rajnesh Vs. Neha has issued the guidelines for awarding main

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top