Srividya K. H. vs State of Karnataka

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Kar) 640

H. P. SANDESH
Srividya K. H. – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mohammed Pasha C, Advocate, Vinayaka V.S, Advocate

JUDGMENT

H.P. Sandesh, J. - This petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail of the petitioner/accused No.10 in Crime No.67/2021 of Thyamagondlu Police Station, Bengaluru District, for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 307, 302, 120B read with Section 149 of IPC.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent/State.

3. The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution against this petitioner is that this petitioner had communicated accused No.9 that the deceased troubling her and in turn accused No.9 conveyed the same to accused No.1 and murder was committed by accused Nos.1 to 5. The allegation against this petitioner is that she conspired with the main accused in eliminating the deceased.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that when the deceased, who is a womanizer troubling this petitioner; she had informed the troublesome of the deceased. Except that there is no allegation against this petitioner and no materials to show that she conspired with accused Nos.1 to 5. The learned counsel also would submit that when the police ca

Click Here to Read the rest of this document