Back
2023 Supreme(Kar) 31
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P. Sandesh, J.
Nanjaiah - Appellant
Versus
Siddamma & Ors. - Respondents
Regular Second Appeal No. 852 of 2019 (INJ)
Decided On : 02-02-2023
Vivek B R, Advocate
Failure to comply with office objections within the stipulated time can result in dismissal of an appeal for non-compliance.
Headnote:Dismissal - Non-compliance with office objections - N/A - The court dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to comply with office objections, despite being granted time to do so.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant failed to comply with office objections despite being granted time to do so.Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appellant did not comply with the office objections within the stipulated time, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance.Issues:
Non-compliance with office objections.Ratio Decidendi:
Failure to comply with office objections within the stipulated time can lead to dismissal of an appeal for non-compliance.Final Decision:
The appeal was dismissed due to non-compliance with office objections.JUDGMENT
H.P. Sandesh, J. - Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant.
2. The counsel for the appellant submits that office objections are raised subsequent to the order passed by this Court on 23.06.2022. The office objections raised only with regard to I.A.No.3/2022 which was filed on 05.07.2022 and earlier to that there were two office objections on I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2022 and this Court granted two weeks' time to comply with the office objections and also made it clear that if office objections are not complied with within the stipulated time, list the matter for dismissal for non-prosecution. Inspite of time was granted vide order dated 23.06.2022, till date, office objections are not complied with. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
