Back
M. G. UMA
Ibrahim Khan @ Asmath Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT
M G Uma, J. - The petitioners-accused Nos.5,7,8 and 10 to 14 are before this Court seeking grant of anticipatory bail in Crime No.187/1993 of Dabaspet Police Station, Nelamangala Taluk, Bengaluru Rural District registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379 and 411 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') and Sections 86 and 87 of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, on the basis of the first information lodged by the informant - Sri M. Subramanya, Dy. S.P., Forest Cell, Bangalore.
2. Heard Sri Leeladhar H.P., learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri H.S.Shankar, learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State. Perused the materials on record.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are arrayed as accused Nos.5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14. Initially, the FIR was registered in the year 1993 and it was only against accused Nos.1 to 3. These petitioners were not named in the FIR. However, much later, while filing the charge sheet, they were arrayed as accused. But the petitioners never informed about the fact that they are arrayed as accused. Recently, they came to know about the registration of the case against
The conduct of the accused and the seriousness of the offences are important factors in determining the grant of anticipatory bail.
Grant of anticipatory bail based on the lack of requirement for further investigation and imposition of specific conditions to address prosecution's apprehensions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for concrete facts and reasonable apprehension for granting anticipatory bail, and the importance of protecting personal liberty under Art....
The Court granted anticipatory bail based on insufficient evidence of specific involvement in the alleged offenses.
The court established that anticipatory bail can be granted even in cases involving serious allegations if the circumstances do not warrant custodial interrogation and the accused demonstrate a willi....
Anticipatory bail denied due to prior criminal cases and recent FIR registration.
Grant of anticipatory bail based on lack of specific overt acts or allegations against the petitioners.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of the progress in the investigation, the absence of the need for custodial interrogation, and the permanent residency of the acc....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
