IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R. Krishna Kumar, J.
Eshwar R & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Karnataka Examination Authority Cet Cell - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 15429, 15545, 15585, 15586, 15782, 15788, 16019, 16417 of 2022, 16805 of 2022 (EDN-RES)
Decided On : 03-09-2022
CET Ranking - Admission to Engineering and Technology Courses - Karnataka Selection of Candidates for Admission to Government Seats in Professional Educational Institutions Rules, 2006 - Rule 4(1)(c), Proviso to Rule 4 - Impugned Note dated 30.07.2022 - Quashed
Fact of the Case:
Petitioners completed II PUC/XII standard in 2021, intended to take admission into professional undergraduate Engineering and Technical courses for the academic year 2022-23. The Karnataka Examination Authority (KEA) issued a note on 30.07.2022 stating that the qualifying marks of students of the year 2021 would not be considered for the academic year 2022-23.
Finding of the Court:
The impugned note was quashed as it was found to be contrary to the Rules of 2006, irrational, arbitrary, and discriminatory. The court directed the respondents to redo the CET rankings for admission to undergraduate courses in Engineering and Technology for the academic year 2022-23 in accordance with Rules 3 and 4 of the Karnataka Selection of Candidates for Admission to Government Seats in Professional Educational Institutions Rules, 2006.
Issues: The main issue was the validity of the impugned note dated 30.07.2022, which directed that the qualifying marks of students of the year 2021 would not be considered for the academic year 2022-23.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the impugned note was contrary to the Rules of 2006, irrational, arbitrary, and discriminatory. It also found that the note was unreasoned, non-speaking, and violated principles of natural justice.
Final Decision: All the petitions were allowed, the impugned note dated 30.07.2022 and the CET Ranking issued by the KEA on 30.07.2022 were quashed, and the respondents were directed to redo the CET rankings for admission to undergraduate courses in Engineering and Technology for the academic year 2022-23.
JUDGMENT
1. Petitioners in all the petitions are students who completed their II PUC /XII standard from the Karnataka State PU Board/CBSE/ICSE/Equivalent in the year 2021 and intend to take admission into professional undergraduate Engineering and Technical courses for the academic year 2022-23.
2. The selection of candidates for admission to seats in professional Educational Institutions is governed by the Karnataka Selection of Candidates for Admission to Government Seats in Professional Educational Institutions Rules, 2006 (for short, 'the said Rules of 2006') which have been framed in exercise of powers under Section 14 of the Karnataka Educational Institutions (Prohibition of Capitation Fees) Act, 1984.
2.1 Rule 3 of the said Rules of 2006 provides for academic eligibility to gain admission into professional courses, while Rule 4 envisages the method for determination of merit of a candidate for admission to the courses under the Rules. Rule 4(1)(c), which is relevant to the instant petitions contemplates that in respect of Engineering and Technology courses, the merit of a candidate eligible for admission shall be determined with reference to marks obtained by them in the Common Entrance Test (for short, 'the CET') and the marks obtained in Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics subjects in the qualifying examination, both taken in equal proportion. The term 'qualifying examination' is defined in Rule 2(t) to mean 2nd year PU examination/XII standard or any other equivalent examination.
2.2 On account of cancellation of the aforesaid II PUC/XII standard examinations for the year 2021, the petitioners did not appear for the said examinations. However, the petitioners were awarded marks and completed their II PUC/XII standard by way of internal assessment by the respective Boards, pursuant to the Government order dated 05.07.2021 issued by the State Government.
2.3 The Karnataka Examination Authority (for short, 'KEA') is the nodal agency responsible for conducting examinations for admissions to professional courses. The KEA conducted the CET for the purpose of admission to undergraduate courses in Engineering and Technology in the year 2021 as well. In this regard, the State Government issued a notification dated 01.09.2021 amending Rule 4 of the said Rules of 2006 by inserting a proviso, which contemplated that in respect of admission to Engineering and Technology courses, merit shall be determined with reference to only the marks obtained in the CET conducted for the academic year 2021-22.
2.4 Pursuant to insertion of the said proviso, all candidates who intended to take admission to Engineering and Technology courses for the academic year 2021-22 were directed to be selected on the basis of marks obtained by them in the CET conducted for the academic year 2021-22, irrespective of when they had completed their II PUC / XII standard, as the case may be. Accordingly, the CET results were announced and ranks were assigned, based on which, admissions were made taking into account only the CET marks and not II PUC/XII standard marks.
2.5 Subsequently, on 18.04.2022, the KEA published an information bulletin inviting applications from students wishing to appear for the CET in 2022 to gain admission to professional courses, including Engineering and Technology courses for the academic year 2022-23. The said bulletin provided for academic eligibility for Engineering and Technology courses by taking both marks obtained in CET and in qualifying examination in equal proportion. Pursuant to the same, petitioners and other students took the CET in 2022 which was conducted during June-July 2022. Subsequently, on 25.07.2022, the KEA issued a circular directing all ICSE/CBSE candidates who have applied for CET 2022 to upload their XII standard marks in the link published in the KEA website on or before 5:00 pm on 26.07.2022.
2.6 On 30.07.2022, the KEA released the CET results and students' rankings. In addition thereto, the KEA also issued the imp
The impugned note was quashed as it was found to be contrary to the Rules of 2006, irrational, arbitrary, and discriminatory.
State governments possess authority to prescribe minimum admission standards within their jurisdiction, emphasizing merit while accommodating special categories.
The court declined to interfere with academic policy concerning examination normalization, holding that technical evaluation methods fall within the domain of expert authorities. Judicial interventio....
The court upheld that changing admission criteria post-examination is arbitrary and violates fairness principles, enforcing that established rules must be maintained throughout the admission process.
Amendments to admission criteria after examination undermine transparency and fairness, constituting a violation of constitutional principles.
The court held that the KSET eligibility declaration must adhere to the reservation requirements mandated by Karnataka law, emphasizing subject-wise representation for equitable access to educational....
Admissions under management quota were deemed unconstitutional, but petitioners were upheld due to merit and lack of statutory violations.
The court emphasized the importance of fulfilling subject mapping criteria for admission through CUET and recognized the discretion available to candidates in choosing subjects closely related to tho....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.