SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 1112

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P.Sandesh, J.
Mazid Ali - Appellant
Versus
Station House Officer Sanjayanagar Police Station - Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 5739 of 2022
Decided On : 21-07-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner ; Sri G.B. Shankarappa, Advocate.; For the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 ; Sri Mahesh Shetty, HCGP.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the nature of the relationship between the victim and the petitioner, including the validity of the marriage and allegations of forced love and marriage, influenced the court's decision in granting bail.

Headnote:

Bail - Prohibition of Child Marriage Act - Summary: The court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving charges under section 376 of IPC, section 4 of POCSO Act, and section 9 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. The court considered the petitioner's argument that the marriage was consensual and that there was no complaint of sexual act prior to marriage. The court also imposed conditions on the petitioner to ensure his appearance before the jurisdictional Court.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought regular bail in a case involving charges under section 376 of IPC, section 4 of POCSO Act, and section 9 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. The victim and the petitioner were in a relationship, got married, and the victim became pregnant. The victim alleged that the petitioner forced her to love him and promised to marry her.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the victim and the petitioner were in a relationship, got married, and lived as husband and wife. The court noted that there was no specific allegation of subjecting the victim to sexual act by the petitioner prior to the marriage. The court granted bail to the petitioner considering that the investigation was completed and charge sheet was filed.

Issues: The issues involved in the case included the nature of the relationship between the victim and the petitioner, the validity of the marriage, and the allegations of forced love and marriage.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the fact that the victim and the petitioner were married and lived as husband and wife, and there was no specific allegation of sexual act by the petitioner prior to the marriage.

Final Decision: The court granted bail to the petitioner in connection with the case, subject to certain conditions to ensure his appearance before the jurisdictional Court.

JUDGMENT

1. This petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail of the petitioner in Crime No. 10/2022 registered by Sanjay Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru, for the offence punishable under section 376 of IPC and section 4 of POCSO Act and section 9 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State. High Court Government Pleader submits that respondent No. 2 has been notified of this petition.

3. The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution based on the statement of the victim is that the victim as well as this petitioner were loving each other and both of them got married, thereafter the petitioner took her to Bengaluru and both of them led the life as husband and wife and thereafter she became pregnant. When the victim went to the hospital, based on her statement, case has been registered invoking section 376 of IPC, section 4 of POCSO and section 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the very statement made by the victim girl clearly discloses that both of them were having acquaintance with each other and they were loving each other. When she refused to marry him, he took care of her and he married her and the same itself clearly discloses that marriage was also performed with the consent of the family members. Thereafter they lived as husband and wife and she became pregnant on account of the marriage. There is also no complaint of sexual act prior to marriage. Investigation is already completed and charge sheet is also filed.

5. Per contra, the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State submits that the victim was minor at the time of marriage. Offence under section 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act is invoked. Apart from that victim was subjected to sexual act and she has become pregnant.

6. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State and also on perusal of the material available on record, the allegation that is made against this petitioner is that he forced the victim girl to love him and when she refused, he promised that he would marry her and take care of her. The statement of the victim also reveals that both of them were loving each other and thereafter both of them married in the presence of the family members, they were living as husband and wife in Bengaluru and she also became pregnant. When she was taken to the hospital, based on her statement case is registered. Having taken note of the fact that they both were married and both of them lived as husband and wife and no specific allegation of subjecting her for sexual act by the petitioner prior to the marriage is made, this court is of the view that it is a fit case for exercising power under section 439 of Cr.P.C since investigation is already completed and charge sheet is also filed.

7. High Court Government Pleader submits that since the petitioner is from Assam, there is likelihood of he fleeing away from justice. If he gets absconded, it will be difficult to secure him for trial. Taking note of the submission of the High Court Government Pleader that there are chances of the petitioner being fleeing away from justice, it is appropriate to impose a condition on the petitioner to furnish local sureties. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will furnish two local sureties. Hence, I pass the following:

ORDER

    The petition is allowed. Consequently, the petitioner shall be released on bail in connection with Crime No. 10/2022 registered by Sanjay Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru, for the offence punishable under section 376 of IPC and section 4 of POCSO Act and section 9 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, subject to the following conditions:

      (i) The petitioner shall execute his personal bond for a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rupee

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top