SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 1146

H. P. SANDESH
Sathisha – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
:- Sri Lakshmikanth K, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Sri H.S. Shankar, HCGP, Sri Chandrashekar P.P, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. This petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. praying this Court to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in respect of Crime No. 120/2022 registered by Maddur Police Station, Mandya, for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 506 and 420 of IPC and Sections 4, 6 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 ('POCSO Act' for short).

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State.

3. The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution is that the complainant/victim has given the complaint before the police stating that when she was a minor in 2017, this petitioner came to her house and taking advantage of her mother and grandmother were not in the house, subjected her for sexual act and thereafter told that he would marry her and threatened not to disclose the same to anybody else. He had postponed the same saying that after attaining the age of 18 years, he would marry her and continuously subjected her for sexual act and ultimately marriage was engaged in the year 2020 and thereafter he has turned hostile saying that his mother is not intere

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top